The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
The greatness of an individual cannot be decided by the ones who live after them or nor by their contemporaries. The greatness is a very big word and should be used carefully, and life is too big to be evaluated by a single measure on a scale or a word like great, common or wicked. The one who lived the life can only decide that thoroughly.
In my view "greatness is a delusion of choices", we are what we do. If this is true then life can be justified on the measure of greatness on the scale of decisive power. The greatness itself is the volatile topic, many people might consider Adolf Hitler as a hero, while other fraction might consider him a maniac. Whether it be contemporaries or the future generation, there were and there will be opposite views for the historical decisions.
Furthermore, the ones who came after a figure of discussion have no idea about the situations on which the decision had made, which gave the person flowers of worship or blood or hatred. In addition to that, the future generation will know only what is articulated, which may be not with the verisimilitude of the situation, as the writers are not fully unbiased. It will be like near to fictional book, which can have multiple meanings based on reader's bias, so in summation, it will create ambiguity and ruin our judgment of accepting something as great justifiably.
On the other side, the views of contemporaries who lived with the figure might be near the truth, but the emotional coherence might not be there to evaluate the greatness. I didn't give my close friend a hint in the examination, and he failed, from that day he blames me for that. I did that in good faith that I will not always be there, but still my image in his view is not good. Without attaching with someone emotionally judging them will not give the truth. In all the contemporaries some are friends and others are rivals, sometimes rival become friends and sometimes friend become opponents, so it is a delusion to judge something as great because it might become wicked someday.
In Summary, one's life is full of complexities to summarize it with a single word or even a book. Life is a delusion of choices, and there is nothing as to right and wrong as far as it is justifiable. Galileo was termed evil by the people of that time and Adolf Hitler as the god, but the future termed out to be exactly opposite and the view might change in future, as nothing is apparent and change is the only constant. To justify the greatness comes from inside not from other people whether it be the ones who lived by your side or will live after you. There will always be criticism and favoritism but if one can justify his own self then there is no way somebody can take greatness from him.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...or a word like great, common or wicked. The one who lived the life can only decide ...
^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on of choices', we are what we do. If this is true then life can be justified...
^^
Line 6, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t be there to evaluate the greatness. I didnt give my close friend a hint in the exam...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 426, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'judges'.
Suggestion: judges
...hout attaching with someone emotionally judging them will not give the truth. In all th...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 13, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t become wicked someday. In Summary, ones life is full of complexities to summari...
^^^^
Line 8, column 356, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ctly opposite and the view might change in future, as nothing is apparent and change is t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, while, as to, in addition, in summary, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55421686747 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6864828392 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461847389558 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4725183659 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34572307401 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109763239533 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135627379944 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208385116793 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152771468873 0.0667264976115 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.