he true test of the greatness of a work of art is its ability to be understood by the masses.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Art is an inner mind of people, by using imagination people express their thoughts. Art attracts humans from the early era. Art could be in any form, some say it is sculpture or paintings, some could say it is architecture and art could be so powerful tool that can begin a renaissance. Art is a trite term and so diversified that understanding every art is impossible, and I disagree with the statement that the true greatness of art is only successful if everyone understands it.
First of all, art is an imagination of a person and it could have a hidden meaning itself. Common people may not understand it or see it, only a connoisseur could understand it. There are many paintings, for example, Composition 8 is an abstract art, and in our common eye, it is nothing but haphazard colors. But a true connoisseur could tell the inner meaning of that painting.
On the other hand, every people has different opinions, everyone could not be on the same page. Some art appreciated at their contemporary time. Some people always again the same idea. For example The last supper, some people consider it as an art, but some people disagree with others and intercept different vision for the paintings. Similarly, many art form were misinterpreted and people thought them as a squander of resources. Peoples rejects an idea when they do not understand them or that idea is ahead of time. people even ambiguous about Shakespeare, some think they were stolen. s, people not always understand or agree with the creator, and that is quite right. Everyone choice should be respected.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that a greatness of an art could not be estimated by everyone, only a connoisseur of that field could understand it, because everyone view the same thing on a different vision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...Art attracts humans from the early era. Art could be in any form, some say it is sc...
^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rful tool that can begin a renaissance. Art is a trite term and so diversified that...
^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...sinterpreted and people thought them as a squander of resources. Peoples rejects an idea w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...and them or that idea is ahead of time. people even ambiguous about Shakespeare, some ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: S
...akespeare, some think they were stolen. s, people not always understand or agree ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, similarly, so, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81028938907 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80208061866 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491961414791 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2500828063 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1111111111 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130742514066 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466490100698 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378133372402 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924834788777 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376618403369 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.