If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Every individual has some unique characteristics. Although equally qualified two candidates can be differentiated with many other attributes other than experience.
More experience in a field does not mean a person has better ideas. A candidate who is prompt and profuse with new ideas is more suitable than a parochial, experienced candidate. If a candidate is getting into the profession of graphic design, the candidate must possess technical skills along with a creative mind. A highly experienced designer may make be quick at making the designs, but there are many adroit professionals like him out there. So how will the recruiting organization have a peculiar work if they too hire professionals with similar abilities?
People with expertise in a particular field have very less to explore. So would that suffice for the job role? In today's world be it any field, people get hired for their inquisitive mind and desire to perform beyond their potential. A recruiter could look for these traits in the candidate and determine weather he/she would continue to explore uncharted territories where no experienced developers would ever reach. In the field of reseach a young applicant would have more enthusiasm than a well established researcher. Although the young applicant can prove better if given a chance as he would encounter all those problems for the first time and solve them in his own unique way. The inexperienced candidate could perhaps garner new techniques with his sheer willpower to learn more.
Notwithstanding the inquisitive nature of the candidate, one must possess enough skills and experience to be able to get the companies demands satisfied. If we hire more experienced software developers the development is bound to be quick. For job roles which demand work to be done with minimal time, nothing can preempt the experience needed to complete the required task. Lesser experienced developers may be enough skilled to compelete the task but would eat up on the resources of the organizations which is not admissable.
Different job roles require different type of candidates. An experienced candidate can provide speed and accuracy while an new comer can provide new innovative ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vidual has some unique characteristics. Although equally qualified two candidates can be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to get the companies demands satisfied. If we hire more experienced software devel...
^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...te can provide speed and accuracy while an new comer can provide new innovative id...
^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: NEW_COMER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newcomer'?
Suggestion: newcomer
...can provide speed and accuracy while an new comer can provide new innovative ideas.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...accuracy while an new comer can provide new innovative ideas.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29378531073 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00288199317 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2026177114 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183144445655 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544730451327 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494425167622 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916096798123 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424505712718 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.