It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data.
Making theories with out data is a big mistake. I strongly disagree with the author's statement. Theorizing is theoretical work, where as acquiring data is practical work. There is big difference in this two. Theoretical data and practical data don't always coincide. It is not always possible to theorize from data obtained because there will be lot of factors playing role like noise from other sources, errors in the machinery and parallax errors.
Theorizing is understanding how something works and developing theory which works in either ideal situations or particular situations. Comparing theoretical values and practical data gives understanding about other factors or error percentage. But theorizing from data may not all ways give ideal theory, considering that it has errors and other factors not accounted for.
As and example to the contradict the given statement, considered Albert Einstein. He developed special theory of relativity that is purely theoretical. Now with advancements in science parts of his theory can be tested. This theory was developed in a room on a blackboard.
Accordingly, nations develop nuclear powered weapons and reactors through theoretical models and test it in controlled environment to obtain data to compare it to understand the errors. But to theorize nuclear theories from practically testing it with out prior knowledge or theoretical knowledge to base on would be disastrous.
For instance in the field of biology theories the reaction of medicine and then test it on animals to test the theory but the other way round.
Thus, to theorize data is not necessary but it can help to evaluate the theory
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
Making theories with out data is a big mistake. I strongly disag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...g mistake. I strongly disagree with the authors statement. Theorizing is theoretical wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...tement. Theorizing is theoretical work, where as acquiring data is practical work. There...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...wo. Theoretical data and practical data dont always coincide. It is not always possi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the machinery and parallax errors. Theorizing is understanding how somethin...
^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ery and parallax errors. Theorizing is understanding how something works and developing theo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
...ntage. But theorizing from data may not all ways give ideal theory, considering that it ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...not accounted for. As and example to the contradict the given statement, considered Albert ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...ar theories from practically testing it with out prior knowledge or theoretical knowledg...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264084507042 0.240241500013 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.176056338028 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0880281690141 0.0880659088768 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492957746479 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0352112676056 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112676056338 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0633802816901 0.0406280797675 156% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9403089861 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0352112676056 0.030933414821 114% => OK
Particles: 0.00704225352113 0.0016655270985 423% => OK
Determiners: 0.056338028169 0.0997080785238 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0176056338028 0.0249443105267 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0140845070423 0.0148568991511 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1662.0 2732.02544248 61% => OK
No of words: 262.0 452.878318584 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.34351145038 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.58838876751 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.404580152672 0.366273622748 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335877862595 0.280924506359 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.24427480916 0.200843997647 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.175572519084 0.132149295362 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9403089861 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 219.290929204 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553435114504 0.48968727796 113% => OK
Word variations: 55.1475639389 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 15.4117647059 23.380412469 66% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4140385635 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7647058824 141.124799967 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 23.380412469 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.674092028746 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 48.9995509654 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.68918918919 1.64882698954 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268645226961 0.391690518653 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0897717706315 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0672862987272 0.077325440228 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.55735483101 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.205874999046 0.149214159877 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981815733898 0.161403998019 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823896603882 0.0892212321368 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.195695477924 0.385218514788 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0540029179865 0.0692045440612 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163778191477 0.275328986314 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102242846476 0.0653680567796 156% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.