It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Major districts are a prime source that preserves a nation's culture. However, not only major cities but also rural areas practice their own traditions and culture. In addition, only a part of a country cannot be thought as constituting the entire convention of a nation.
Admittedly, it is inevitable that major cities are a big foundation of ancient culture such as Seoul in Korea, and Rome in Italy. Seoul being a capital of Korea for over 600 years, contains numerous traditional artifacts and buildings like the Kyung-Bok palace. In addition, 30% of the population is residing in Seoul, so to feel the core convention of Korea, tourists usually visit Seoul. Also, Rome famous for being a capital for over 1000 years also is filled with ancient buildings such as the Colosseum and the government of Italy allots a part of the national budget in order to preserve these national monuments. Hence, to taste and feel the country it would be wise to visit it's major city.
Nevertheless, the major cities are not the only districts that have historic monuments. In KyungJu, a suburb area in Korea, used to the capital of Shilla. Shilla was lasted for over 500 years and was famous for it's luxurious arts and crafts. Today in KyungJu, you can visit artificial lakes designed for emperors of the era, and various museums that exhibit endless Shilla artifacts exhumed from old graves. Also, you can experience the tradition of Shilla because the people there still practice the old culture of the extinct nation. Hence, it would be hasty of conclude that the nation's main culture is from the major cities.
Finally, the culture cannot be defined as only the part of the countries area. It consists of all the traditions and practice, significant or not. The Korean culture is not only defined by Seoul or KyungJu, but by the aggregated culture of all the area's inside the land. Traveling only to Seoul would be wrong to experience Korea as a whole: because the Korean culture is a iridescent mixture of all the traditions of the territory. The same analogy can be applied to any country. Italy for example, has it's own mixture of cultures from different areas. Venice for example, exhibits a different form of living and traits compared to Rome - all these traits are the part of Italy. Consequently, a single province would never be able to represent the whole nation.
In conclusion, it is lucid that representative provinces present major sources of traditions, small alienated areas also contain idiosyncratic actions. Furthermore, the mixture of all these customs constitute the nation's characteristics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...nnot be defined as only the part of the countries area. It consists of all the traditions...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... a whole: because the Korean culture is a iridescent mixture of all the tradition...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0183908046 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71734694379 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464367816092 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4100510049 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9583333333 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 19.0 4.83258426966 393% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130138923154 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393542345303 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338020324159 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719310660311 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397137592795 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.