It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an

Essay topics:

It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The statement contends that it is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. Thinking about the introduction that people usually give to others, the statement is generally true, as human is cited as social animal and the filtering activates before introducing oneself. Also, the emotions floating through such relations should be considered.

Human is cited as social animal and it is easily recognized that humans think oneself as the part of the society, not the opposite way. The best way to examine the identification would be remembering how people introduce oneself to newly met people. According to the new York times, the first sentence of the introduction includes one’ name and where the person is working. Also, people usually ask about what kind of university that student is attending, or what kind of company the business person is working as a chief manager.

While conceding the statement above, the opponents of the statement contend that as the person gets longer time for introduce oneself, the one explains about what oneself is truly are such as explaining personal proclivity of colors and dishes. Rather than listing the names and titles of the societies that the one was once or is included, the person shows one’s personal identity, exposing the unique character to others. Therefore, the identification is more focused on the personality, not the social group.

It is true that people gives more information about heterogeneous aspects when introducing to others, such contention could be stated because it is not profoundly examined about what different perspective that people are willing to expose. Even when introducing oneself, no one arbitrarily throws the information about what the other might think dirty and ominous. They usually think about something amicable and sanguine considering the relation among them.

Furthermore, the social groups give positive emotions to the participants and not being one give negative emotions. People feel depression when they are leaving original group and feel happy when they enters new social group.

In conclusion, when the people define themselves, they primarily set as the participant of the social groups.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...way to examine the identification would be remembering how people introduce oneself to newly m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ne explains about what oneself is truly are such as explaining personal proclivity ...
^^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'enter'
Suggestion: enter
...original group and feel happy when they enters new social group. In conclusion, whe...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42693409742 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80366013925 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521489971347 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4058052637 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117497589954 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524424521018 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084990010787 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757085960425 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635316803659 0.0667264976115 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.