The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Present generation is gifted with immense luxury when we compare with the earlier time. As now, people can get all the things they want at their footstep, starting from food delivery to personal cabs, to home tutor and the list goes on. They will never know the struggle that the older generation went through for the most trivial things. However, while doing so, the past generation learnt the value of things, as they were not at ease to get, which helped them to strive hard for their living to become strong and independent individuals. As everything is at their disposal now, these luxuries frustrate the current generation to thrive for the same. Hence, I agree with the given claim.
First of all, things have become so accessible now, people just don’t want to work for it. For an instance, the children of the present are now provided with cell phones even before they turn ten. Not just cell phone, but whatever they ask for like costly video game, food of their choice, luxuries of personal vehicle while commuting that they hardly realize that these come at a price which is earned by toiling day and night. On the other hand, in the before times, children had to travel long distances to study or stay in Gurukul or boarding school. They hardly had any such privilege which drove their motivation of achieving the inaccessible. But, now the kids lack this kind of motivation.
Adding to the previous paragraph, freed from any household chores like cooking, cleaning or washing their own clothes, the children of current generation are coddled and pampered way too much. Once they go out of the house, they feel home sick and are mostly unable to adjust. I have personally seen so many children to not pursue studies outside their home town because they are home sick or incapable of adjusting to the outside world. Had these children not treated with so much delicacy, they would have learnt to manage themselves from the childhood and had not missed such an amazing experience of staying independently. I have even seen so many kids, from college, who can’t even fill an application form, drive or cook a meal for themselves.
It is true that, in most of the cases, all these conveniences make people handicap of doing any thing on their own, it is also undeniable that these conveniences can enable individuals to transcend the impossible if these same luxuries are used in a good way. For example, computers, smart phones or internet connection has enabled individuals to do their personal works in few minutes, be it their bank work, tax filing or even sharing documents with their peers for knowledge, without asking for help or depending on others to do it for them unlike in earlier time, where people had to go to post office for sharing any document or hire a CA for filing their tax returns.
Hence, in summary, current world conveniences have enabled individuals to do their work on their own if these conveniences are used for development. But at the same time, if we just keep depending on them and become crutched in absence of these luxuries, then the same luxury can impede our growth and thwart us to become independent and strong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...veniences make people handicap of doing any thing on their own, it is also undeniable tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in summary, kind of, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81386861314 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49222243758 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516423357664 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.9316124316 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.619047619 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0952380952 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941740287939 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347440533736 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292323508502 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615475946235 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283979690352 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.