Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
Advancement of technology has flooded us with information on different subjects. Every information is just a click away, its range is enormous from how to paint to how to make delicious food. With single query, different search engines result thousands of results in a few seconds. Each of the results carries some additional information, so now it entirely depends on the user how much he/she wants to absorb from it. Now it itself has its own advantages and disadvantages, and people are divided into different groups on the basis of their opinion on this topic. Few consider that human race successfully adapted to new change and we have uplifted our analysis ability due to which we could extract relevant information from the pile of data, on the other hand, some support the fact that due to this large amount of information we are not much focussed nowadays, as like we are in some kind of hurry and donont usually spend much time on a particular thing. In my opinion, we are successfully evolved our tendency of multi-tasking in this era of competition and thankfully we have reached a point where are comfortable with our ability to perform muti-tasks. To bolster my point, I will explain each point with suitable example.
Firstly, in present scenario, every second is well before planned, and we just need to perform those tasks on that time, to prove ourself efficient and accurate we need to perform different things t a particular time, and successfully we have achieved that ability. For instance, as a researcher, I need to perform my writing work and data analysis part along with my experiments, if I just do one task at a time, then it will not be an efficient utilization of my time, I need to work more strategic way to perform all work with accuracy. hence, somehow I am benefitted with this notion as presented in the excerpt.
Secondly, sometimes we did not get the desired information from one source only, so we need to search for different other options to extract desired information. But, after extracting the relevant information from online resources somehow, we people have developed our sharp eyes to get the desired information. Albeit, it may take some time but over a course a time it enables us to identify the desired information. For instance, all the information so available on online resources is not correct, also, we different resources use similar type of content, so with it is our ability to extract the unique information from that specific source. Such type of ability helps us to garner a lot of information in a limited time frame.
Albeit, there are positive effects of short span on people but sometimes, this short span may hurt our social skills, our relationships with our closed one or peers, and may create hindrance in our success. Like, when we spent quality time with our family, friends that time they expect our complete attention, and at that time our short attention span may hurt their feelings, which somehow will have negative impact on our understanding and relationship.
It is concluded that, like every scenario, this situation also consists of two parts, one is positive and negative, though positive overshadow negative but those few limited negative effects are very crucial, hence one should critically analyze and think that where to implement this multi-tasking and short attention ability and where we need give our one hundred percent. As a matter of work and performance, this concept is useful but its judicious use is necessary. It is an important decision for an individual person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apted to new change and we have uplifted our analysis ability due to which we cou...
^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... way to perform all work with accuracy. hence, somehow I am benefitted with this noti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 79.0 33.0505617978 239% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2985.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 601.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96672212978 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95129289623 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80562149686 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472545757072 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 970.2 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0983292721 60.3974514979 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.619047619 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125558990478 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412009157988 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282029823791 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758149711292 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110957791272 0.0667264976115 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.