Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks.
Someone who still believes that men and women are not equal should be banished to the the caveman age, not because his beliefs are outdated, but to get a refresher in gender equality. For in that age men and women were more equal than in present times.
Such persons would also deny that man is an animal. Despite anyone's most vigorous protests we can't deny that man is an animal, albiet a highly evolved one. Can you classify man as a plant or a mushroom? A look at the animal world would clearly reveal that both sexes enjoy the same tasks and share responsibilities.
It is a fact that men and women were created equal, society created differential roles and, hence, the differences. To explore where the divide began, we would have to go back in time when the Neanderthals and other forms of Homo sapiens were still hunter-gatherers. Men and women used to hunt and forage together till the advent of agriculture and the formation of social groups forced a distribution of duties for efficiency. Yet, women continued to perform many roles which are now considered suited only for men. History is full of examples of women who were equally good in science, math, politics and even the battlefield. Madame Curie won two Noble prizes, although she unknowingly gave her life in her noble pursuit. Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi were stronger in politics than many of their pussilaminous contemporaries. Women have excelled even in the final frontier in space.
So why do we continue to harp on this so called inequality? Yes, there are inherent physical differences which set them apart for biological functions. In fact there are differences in the mental sphere too. But that does not make either sex unsuitable for any tasks. Anyone who wants her to be relegated to the task of a nurse, probably can't see her as an equal as a doctor.
Some may argue that women are unsuitable for military tasks. Au contraire, women have been fierce battle strategists and have led several gory battles from the front. The only time when a woman may be considered vulnerable is when she is pregnant. But anyone who has tried to attack a pregnant or nursing mother knows she is at her fiercest in that phase.
So why do we keep perpetuating this misogynistic notion? It seems to stem only from a patriarchal overarching desire to control the social construct and has none whatsoever to do with physical differences. Men and women were created equal, have continued to be equal, and if women have been relegated to and limited to only certain pursuits in the past, they are bouncing back now to claim their rightful place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...men are not equal should be banished to the the caveman age, not because his beliefs ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...men are not equal should be banished to the the caveman age, not because his beliefs ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...spite anyones most vigorous protests we cant deny that man is an animal, albiet a hi...
^^^^
Line 13, column 339, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...egated to the task of a nurse, probably cant see her as an equal as a doctor. ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...as an equal as a doctor. Some may argue that women are unsuitable for military ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, so, still, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82637362637 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68099980089 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556043956044 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7278446334 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4615384615 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.96153846154 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340408455005 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762291329478 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809230319077 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148137883082 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838030733451 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.