Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address

Essay topics:

Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Men and women have physical differences like endurance and muscular strength. The issue that they are not equally suited for certain tasks is quite contentious. There are many reasons why women have not worked in certain fields. The outlook of society towards females have made a mental imagery that some tasks could not be performed by females. We know that anything could be mastered by a human in 10000 hours of practice. Women are humans and they can also master the tasks that are not equally suited for them like man. On a contrary, men could not do certain tasks like taking care of child and other household work is also a false claim. The society has remained like this for a long time and henceforth the issue of something could be done by one gender and not by another had arised.

Women has always been involved in household works and taking care of kids and old ones. Therefore, we don't see much females in high positions and heavy working conditions. It had happened because of the orthodox and gloomy outlook of people for working women. There have been many examples in the wars and sports competitions where women have done phenomenal jobs. Similarly, there are men who take care of their young ones and do the regular daily work without any women in their house.

Some people might say that women can do many tasks going out of limit of their capacity, but the output would not be extremely good as that of men. They actually don't know, that men had been doing a particular task for centuries and women have started very less time ago and so they won't supersede the output of men.

In conclusion, there are some tasks that a women need to work around a little bit more than men but could be accomplished by women and vice versa.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...are of kids and old ones. Therefore, we dont see much females in high positions and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ds and old ones. Therefore, we dont see much females in high positions and heavy wor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... be extremely good as that of men. They actually dont know, that men had been doing a particu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mely good as that of men. They actually dont know, that men had been doing a particu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...n conclusion, there are some tasks that a women need to work around a little bit more t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...conclusion, there are some tasks that a women need to work around a little bit more t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...asks that a women need to work around a little bit more than men but could be accomplished...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5923566879 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23719257777 2.79657885939 80% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515923566879 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9040131086 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.125 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209069886699 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785901780587 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392356098954 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132165381912 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265653004472 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.