Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
The basic claim of the author attempts to represent the complexities in considering gender equality. Men and Women are the two most rudimentary and brief classification of the Human species as a whole. Despite belonging to the same class of species, Men and Women have surprisingly different characteristics; be it body, voice, nature and so on. The author emphasizes on the inherent physical differences between the two genders and veraciously elucidates the inability to perform a specific task at the same rate or similar efficacy.
Gender equality is one of the most sensitive and polemic issues prevailing in the current generation. There have been many controversies about man being the superior or dominant among the two genders, and women have conspicuously suffered excruciating discrimination over centuries; however it would not be entirely refutable to delineate that women are physically inefficient in comparison to men in most of the cases. However, it doesn't necessarily mean that men must be superior or dominant. Perhaps, it is true that both men and women are not equally suited for many tasks.
For example, consider sports, where the rules are slightly altered when it comes to women, not because women are being discriminated, but simply because it could make the game more meaningful and plausible. Let us consider a specific sport such as cricket; the boundaries of the ground are kept shorter and the duration of the play is slightly reduced for the women's cricket because women doesn't have the same physical strength and stamina as men does. There are numerous such examples that profoundly depict that women indeed must not be expected of the similar efficacy as men must.
Nevertheless, it isn't sagacious to assume that women are weaker or inferior in comparison to men, nor does the claim of the author insinuates so. The author simply suggests that men and women are physically different and thus, must be tasked accordingly. There is no ignominy for a woman if she isn't able to perform a task physically as efficiently as an analogous men, it is simply because of her inherent physical features that hinders her. Even though there should be gender equality, there should also be a difference in allocation of the tasks for men and women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...o men in most of the cases. However, it doesnt necessarily mean that men must be super...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ed for the womens cricket because women doesnt have the same physical strength and sta...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ficacy as men must. Nevertheless, it isnt sagacious to assume that women are weak...
^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...There is no ignominy for a woman if she isnt able to perform a task physically as ef...
^^^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...ysically as efficiently as an analogous men, it is simply because of her inherent p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11260053619 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89674779429 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517426273458 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0840140809 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.133333333 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231371069579 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088516190676 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051647357182 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148699451939 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365958075156 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.