Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Indeed men and women have inherent physical differences and for these reasons, each kind is tailored for particular tasks. I agree with the statement so long as the tasks in questions are limited to the physical-requiring tasks and not tied to intellectual tasks.
Generally, men, in terms of physical strength, are at an advantage compared to women. For this reason, ardous menial tasks are in most cases performed by men and not women. To be specific, in a developing country where a labor at a construction site is predominantly dependent on manual labor, men are most likely the ones to work at that site, given their strengeth endowment. In such a situation then, the statement is valid are women are unlikely to perform the task.
Building up on the physical difference between men and women, each of them are strategically are interdependent on each other. Women are built to be care givers while on the other hand men are built to protect and provide. Inaurgably, the 21st century has presented the both genderes opportunities where such thought is defied. For instatnce, the tasks once known for men can be also executed by women and vice versa. Notwihstanding that these tasks are executed, they are not done as well as they would were the gender suited for the task originally undertook the task. To illustrate, today we have stay home dads who assume the role of women by taking care of the ir families, while they succeeded in doing so, their success is limited and they cannot perform as well as women would in that capacity.
Unfortunately, the difference between men and women has been negatively used to diminish the relevance women in the society. In non-liberised socities, women have been opppresed and men regard to be dominant than them. Consequently, women have been many rights such as education, freedom of speech or even just a right to make decisions. This idea is chauvanistic and has been preached against by human rights agencies across the globe. Given that the statement is not specific on the tasks, it could be inferred to some extent that men are better than women, which is not the case. On intelllcetual basis, the two are the same and only value that an individual adds to any situation should be considered and not their gender. An elaborate example is a college committee selecting applicants, they should select students based on their academic credentials and not their gender.
In conclusion, men and women are distinct and this distinction is only relevantto the task requiring certain qualities that only either of them have. On the intellectual frointer however, the two are equal and no bias should be placed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
Indeed men and women have inherent physical di...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...d women, each of them are strategically are interdependent on each other. Women are...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95768374165 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8320690276 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512249443207 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2128541491 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229020759501 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702356208412 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454363563084 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129354744239 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400614534091 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.