Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Are men and women not suited equally for certain tasks because of their physical differences? In the statement provided here, the speaker claims so. I do not agree with this statement however, and believe that there are no such limitations on the work which one gender can do and other cannot, just because of their physical differences.
There are both men and women in every field of work today. Considering fields like weightlifting or politics, where there were only males a few centuries back, there are females also today, and many of them have outperformed men in those fields. Considering cooking and upbringing families which were thought as tasks only for women, now have men also. There is no such field left where the tasks cannot be performed by men or by women.
There are both men and women as presidents, running a whole country, as astronauts that are going out in the space, scientists doing research, doctors curing people, engineers designing new machines and software, artists who make paintings, swimmers, athletes’, dancers, etc.
A few centuries back, it was widely thought that only men can do jobs, and women were only to bring up families, nurture children, make food and take care of their homes. But now, this is not the case. I have seen families where the women do work and men take care of their homes and families. I’ve also seen families where both men and women go out for work. Apart from this, science has advanced so much now, that those tasks which would have only been performed by a man’s body or a woman’s body before, can be now done by the person of the other gender.
Therefore, I would totally disagree with the statement provided and would firmly stick to my opinion that both man and woman can perform the tasks which is possible for humans to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...t as tasks only for women, now have men also. There is no such field left where the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8025477707 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50063077766 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531847133758 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4239349387 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265484305198 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110467867695 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129243017485 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143422234346 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110937727271 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.