A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The topic raises an issue of whether nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. There are some important achievements specific to certain regions which may not be taught to students if the curriculum is same for the whole country. But, There are more positives for keeping the same national curriculum for the students until they enter college.
First of all, same national curriculum leads to no discrimination among students in rural areas. It would be easy for students in rural areas to compete for best colleges which mostly are situated in major cities of the country. for instance, in India, students in many rural areas are not taught subjects in English language, which after the schooling leads to a major drawback for them as they have to compete with students with maybe same intellect but an advantage of English language. Same national curriculum requires same infrastructure standards all over the nation. So achieving same national curriculum will ensure that infrastructure of schools in rural areas is not less than schools in cities. This in turn will lead to decrease in illiteracy of the country which in turn will increase the economic growth of the country.
Furthermore, achieving same national curriculum will also decrease pressure from student's mind. It will lead to decrease in the number of entrance tests given by the students after their schooling to compete for different colleges. In India, We have different boards for every states and every state has different grading system. This is also very deleterious for a student's future. Let's taken a example for Pune board, where students are scrutinized more than the students in CBSE board when it comes to the marks given to them. This lead to decrease in marks students get, in Pune board. Which in turn decrease their chances of getting into good colleges as compared to students in CBSE board. So, leading to same national curriculum will lead to same board exams, which will give equal opportunity to every student to get into colleges based on their merit.
Finally, if same national curriculum is achieved, there is a possibility that some historical achievements specific to a certain state, which may not be important for other states, is not taught to the students of that state. But overall, as mentioned in above points, there are more advantages of achieving same national curriculum.
So, national curriculum should be same, as it would give equal opportunities to all the students in the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ituated in major cities of the country. for instance, in India, students in many ru...
^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rious for a students future. Lets taken a example for Pune board, where students ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, as to, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0973871734 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65762714492 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422802850356 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0400614071 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.05 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351587252692 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139661134987 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102303934698 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248713438682 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111995919335 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.