A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The nature of educational courses has always been controversial. While some people believe that all students in a country should study a universal curriculum, others take the view that minor differences should also be taken into account in designing these materials. I believe that educational courses should be tailored based on local culture and history. However, having similar courses through a national curriculum is inevitable.
On the one hand, students who enter into an educational facilities have different backgrounds regarding culture, language, and history. In order to provide sufficient insight about aforementioned differences, designers of educational materials should try to address these aspects appropriately. For instance, native students in Australia need to preserve their cultural heritage. Not only they should talk their native language fluently, but also they need to understand the rationale behind these costumes. A great way to inform these students is providing useful information about their culture in a specific local curriculum.
Likewise, different students have various talents like music and math. If educational facilities provide good courses addressing these facets of knowledge, these precocious children will be able to nurture their talents. As a result, they can map their future to success more easily.
On the other hand, students should have basic knowledge of certain fields such as math, chemistry, and physics. Officials should include these basic fields in all tailored curriculum since they are not subject to culture and geography. For instance, students should be able to use their math abilities in their future careers regardless of their background. Having a good wisdom about art and sport is vital for all students living in a country, too. As a result, having similar courses in a national curriculum is unavoidable.
However, a more viable solution to this problem is considering the mentioned aspects in a more innovative way. An effective national curriculum should prepare reliable understanding of basic fields as well as providing local materials for certain groups of people. So, not only students who enter college are qualified scientifically, but also they are familiar with their cultural roots.
To sum up, providing a same national curriculum for all students in a nation might not be practical. A tailored curriculum, on the other hand, can provide more profound insights in students from different cultural backgrounds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'facility'?
Suggestion: facility
... students who enter into an educational facilities have different backgrounds regarding cu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63060686016 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94664722375 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506596306069 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9905492456 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2272727273 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183457010841 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636044683343 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528928932405 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114164738823 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493301567238 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.