Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is suggested that governments should allocate the funding of arts to more challenging sections such as unemployment and hunger. Although the statement might seem quite convincing, I take the view that the government should support art since it is a significant aspect of any prosperous society. Governments should also find permanent solutions for the mentions issues.
Firstly, art plays a key role in modern societies. First of all, artists are able to preserve and propagate their cultural heritage via pieces of art such as paintings, movies, poets, and so on. Second of all, presenting products in the art section in galleries can attract professional tourists to visit them closely. This feature of art can produce substantial amounts of monetary benefits to a country. In addition, art can improve the social awareness of people. The public can understand the most influential social problems by watching a movie. Likewise, a specific gallery about working children can instigate social campaigns to help them in terms of money and shelter. So, art is significant enough to be considered as an inseparable part of governmental financial aids.
Secondly, the share of funding allotted to arts is insignificant in many countries. The USA, for instance, earmarked about 0.5 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) to art section in 2016. Likewise, the share of art galleries and their related organizations only comprised 1 percent of the total budget in the UK in 2017. Therefore, the amount of money allocated to support art is not comparable to other sections such as national defense.
Thirdly, large amounts of money are squandered in certain sections annually. For example, countries underwrite their defense section by allocating more than 50 percent of their total GDP in order to buy new equipment as well as mass destruction weapons. However, the outcome of these supports are not very tangible, and even if they can produce any results, they are death and horror. Moreover, political campaigns receive ever-increasing financial aids from governments during election season. The effectiveness of these budgets on improving routine problems such as unemployment and hunger is not clear, though.
Finally, governments must seek permanent and viable solutions for their challenging situations such as high rates of unemployed people. Creating stable job positions as well as imposing new policies such as reducing taxes can address this important problem very effectively. Governments can reduce their defense budgets to help poor people to find a better job, and eventually to have access to healthy foods. A reduction in financial aids to political institutions can bring about a more equitable society, too.
To sum up, since art can benefit the economy and the society, governments should support it unconditionally. Reducing unnecessary budgets from other sections such as military and politics and allocating them to social welfare part can help governments to manage unemployment and hunger more easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther sections such as national defense. Thirdly, large amounts of money are squa...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyment and hunger is not clear, though. Finally, governments must seek permanent...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge unemployment and hunger more easily.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2570.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42194092827 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97711245362 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2418962852 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8461538462 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80769230769 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127600894995 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040185801545 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330458069005 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789261696435 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399047696189 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.