A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The recommendation that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, in contrast, seems as fruitful as it would be disadvantageous. The relevancy of the recommendation provided by the speaker is limited in its own context because of necessity of curriculum to be dependant on various other factors that maynot result in same conclusion.
Firstly, if we try to evaluate the pros of maintaining the same national curriculum until students enter the college, it would not to be difficult to analyse the requirement of basic knowledge, moral terms, ethics, society, being sociable and expansive, e.t.c for a growing child irrespective of what field of study he/she might go on for in their future.These basic foundations of knowledge that the students require can be fulfilled from maintaining the same national curriculum, which in turn would also be supported by the fact that maintaining the same national curriculum is far more easier and effective.
Moreover, also the uniformity in the national curriculum that child study, can effectively provide same ground and base for all of the students to stand on so that when required, they can choose their field of study wisely and there would not be any partiality on knowledge terms for any students to attend any field of study. For example, if the same curriculum are not maintained throught out some of students may get partial benefit over other students while choosing their major study; students who got chance to study the relevant study matter helping them to futher foster their field of study are in more benefit than those students who might not have got the curriculum which would favour them in fostering their future studies.
However, some drawbacks regarding maintaining same national curriculum would encorporate the facts that the necessity of different regional people may be different. There may be some extreme requirements to include some more information than those encorporated in national curriculum due to certain local uniquness, history , culture or any other important matter.It would be impossible to maintain those requirements.
Furthermore, it is well believed that fostering a child in the field in which it shows the prominent talent from beginning can lead to immense exposure of that talent. For example, a child interested in sports from childhood if given chance in sports from beginning can show immense growth in talent and can be a master of that field. So, same national curriculum would be discouraging for providing requirement based knowledge to everone.
Thus, with both pros and cons of maintaining same national curriculum, it would be deemed wise to believe whatever is done could lead in prosperous future if maintained with proper knowledge and planning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...ecause of necessity of curriculum to be dependant on various other factors that maynot re...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... he/she might go on for in their future.These basic foundations of knowledge that the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ing the same national curriculum is far more easier and effective. Moreover, also the un...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tively provide same ground and base for all of the students to stand on so that when requi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the students') or simply say ''some students''.
Suggestion: some of the students; some students
...riculum are not maintained throught out some of students may get partial benefit over other stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... due to certain local uniquness, history , culture or any other important matter.I...
^^
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
..., culture or any other important matter.It would be impossible to maintain those r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28824833703 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89584360977 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 138.552970448 60.3974514979 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 216.818181818 118.986275619 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 23.4991977007 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.21951772744 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283875192374 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135710402055 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106905527691 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170043191191 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084416001839 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 14.1392134831 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 48.8420337079 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 12.1743820225 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.29 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.