People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The point of view presented here that criticizes the behaviour of the human to make emotion based decisions at first, and afterwards justify them by designating them as poor decision makers.In my opinion, the issue presented is to great extent a undeniable truth of our society,nation and whole human race as a whole.
At first, any person who is trying to make decisions based on the emotions are blinkered individual who cannot precisely make an rational analysis on the decision making sitution. Emotions often deviates a persons thought from what he/she would have in absence of those extreme emotions. For example, we can easily see the regret among the persons who makes sudden decisions in presence of extreme emotions such as anger, love, joy and later find it irrational by themselves.
Secondly, the reason why people tentative to make decisions based on emotions donot have that brainstorming thoughts going inside themselves regarding the present as well as future consequences that could arise from the decision. In the absence of that awareness no person can have better decision making ability at that point of time.
For better understanding of any issue demanding logical decision making, the person must be free of temporary state of emotions and have better reasonable logic on the decision. A free state of mind is best for these analyses and decision making; the blinkered vision and views are no good in these extremely significant situations.
Often people share their experience in terms of brainfarts or disability of brain to proper logical functioning when they are preoccupied by emotions pertaining to extreme happiness as they are about to welcome a new member in family or state of extreme mournuful situation as demise of family member.
Furthermore, it is as unwise as supplying proper medication to extremely ill person after reaching the condition from where no treatment is possible when a person tries to justify the already made irreversible decision. The outcome of the decision is to be analysed before the decision; doing it after the consequences of decision begin to appear is not going to help rectify it.
Finally, the pros of early analysers and rational decision makers in terms of critical decision making can viewed in terms that the chances of wrong decisions are less and also the consequences of the decision are known. People in our society with extreme success are often the exemplar of radical thinker, slow decider yet effective ones. Considering fact that most of the paragons of their respective fields are not in their present state of respect pertaining to their emotional thinking; rather, it is as a result of their close
observations, prophecies and good logical reasonings before making any decisions. Thus, the persons flummoxed with emotions are usually poor dec
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...esignating them as poor decision makers.In my opinion, the issue presented is to g...
^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the issue presented is to great extent a undeniable truth of our society,nation ...
^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , nation
...extent a undeniable truth of our society,nation and whole human race as a whole. At fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ed individual who cannot precisely make an rational analysis on the decision makin...
^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rather, it is as a result of their close observations, prophecies and good logica...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2378.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18082788671 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77265964471 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501089324619 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.7585457551 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.533333333 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.21951772744 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307696212783 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10950197715 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614634548002 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142661482163 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526036621932 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.