A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Stating that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, the author asserts that the key role of education is to raise their children as a similar person. In some senses, it is beneficial for students to have common senses or similar point of view in terms of helping get jobs and have sociability. In my point, however, these standard teaching is harmful to prodigies for any field and kids want to be an artist or sports-star.
Of course, few would disagree that going to school and following schematic education is good for students to be made the person who the society needs. Through the curriculum, the children can acquire basic skills and bits of knowledge and logic. For example, kids can have abilities to communicate with others by playing with friends and to think logically and reasonably by learning mathematics and science. This implies that regular lesson in public school help for students grow up as 'mature adults'
Nonetheless, can we say the hard teaching is helpful for children? My answer is no. there are many geniuses who have the present for specific fields like mathematics, science or language. the governments have a duty to support their gift with special schools or education to train them as future professionals. In Korea, there are schools for these children to train them. the graduates of these facilities have been worked as a scientist, engineer, and diplomatic. This example shows that focusing on one field could be more efficient than perfunctory and diverse education.
Moreover, if there is one individual who wants to be a sports star, those subjects could be useless for him. Can Cristiano Ronaldo be a great sportsman if he has done school homework every day and learned irrelevant matters with soccer? Even if he didn't go school every day and were absent for practicing and running matches, he is rated as a successful man and great sports star who has magnificent records and feats. This implies that studying in school is not the only way to succeed in a society
To summarize, it is deniable that the school is key to developing ourselves. When it comes to the field of sport and arts and kids who have talent, however, the uniform education is always necessary
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp for students grow up as mature adults Nonetheless, can we say the hard teachin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... like mathematics, science or language. the governments have a duty to support thei...
^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hools for these children to train them. the graduates of these facilities have been...
^^^
Line 8, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...elevant matters with soccer? Even if he didnt go school every day and were absent for...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not the only way to succeed in a society To summarize, it is deniable that the sc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91214470284 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65453291798 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6831091903 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.611111111 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145540939898 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450903266823 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147718587418 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882630101566 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147896496327 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.