Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The boom in industrialization has taken a toll on "Mother Nature". Humans have exploited every aspect of nature for its own needs and it is the nature that is paying the price for it. Global warming and its effects are key indicators that the nature cannot face any more exploitation at the hands of humans. It is now up to nations and its citizens to take up a stand in order to make sure the future generations have a world to live in and hence I believe that nations should pass laws for protecting the wilderness in their natural state rather than turning it into yet another economic venture.
It is of high importance that the natural wilderness of a nation is preserved. This is because the flora and the fauna are key aspects of the whole ecosystem of a nation. If continued economic exploitation leads to the extinction of a certain species of plant or animal, it causes a grave dis-balance in the ecological system. There are quite a few examples like the Dodo, that vanished from the face of earth because humans did not think a second before destroying the natural habitat it lived in. This eventually meant that the Dodo was eradicated form our planet for ever. Rhinos and Tigers are another class of animals that are on the verge of extinction. If we keep destroying their natural habitats or keep hunting them, they will soon be on the same list of animals as the Dodo. I would suggest that the nations, designate areas where such animal live as natural reserves or sanctuaries which would protect these animals from humans.
Moreover, the governments of different nations shall compel the multi-national companies to adopt ecological methods for running an industrial setup. Companies like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and many more have pledged to go carbon-free soon. This is a big step towards reducing the carbon content that is present in our atmosphere. Carbon is the key element that contributes to global warming, reduction in carbon emissions will go about a long way in controlling the increasing temperatures of the world. Additionally, a law can be put in place based on the size of a company. A law that makes the company pay a small percent of amount as tax, that would be consolidated in a fund that has to be used only for the betterment of the natural wilderness of the nation.
Implementing laws to preserve the natural wilderness of a nation is easy to implement in developed nations but developing nations are still striving hard to be on par with the developed countries. These nations can put a little less importance on the natural wilderness and concentrate more upon bolstering their economy. Developing nations and developed nations can work in harmony, wherein the developed countries put more emphasis upon the natural wilderness whereas the developing nation stress upon the economy of the country. If nations work in sync. A positive outcome can come out of such a collaboration.
In sum, I am a strong advocate of the fact that the natural wilderness of the whole world is in a dire condition due to its exploitation by humans. Therefore, nations should start passing laws such that citizens of the nation do not inflict more damage on the natural wilderness of a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...stress upon the economy of the country. If nations work in sync. A positive outcom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86256781193 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83673324707 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490054249548 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 870.3 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7820253249 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.56 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.12 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280368375572 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071339219597 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592359367534 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152131774308 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353022580209 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.