Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

The question of if preservation of certain areas is beneficial to the human race is an intricate one. Some believe the preservation of any remaining wilderness areas is not advantageous to humans, especially if these areas can be used to economic gain. However, nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their national state because this could prevent extinction of certain animals and we can expand our knowledge of nature.

First, by preserving wilderness areas, we can aid in the prevention of extinction for other plants and animals. For example, it is widely known that the pandas are endangered animals and can potentially go extinct if not extremely cautious. By taking care of the areas they reside, we can prolong the life of these animals or even stop the extinction process in general. Every animal and plant play a specific role in the community they are habitants of. This role is advantageous to some and disadvantageous to others. So, if an entire species goes extinct, this could lead to the struggle or even downfall of another species. In other words, saving a community from extinction can stop a domino effect that could come into play. Because of this, the preservation of the wilderness is important and should be kept save.

Furthermore, preserving the wilderness areas can help us broaden our understanding of the natural world. Take into consideration the endangered honeybee species. Honeybees have an important role in making honey, but they also have other purposes. By preserving the honeybee habitats, we can learn more about them and put puzzle pieces together to see how things work together or work against each other. Learning such processes can help us understand the intelligence of certain species, what specific roles are played by each creature and how one aspect effects another. In turn, preserving such areas will aid in the advancement of science and scientific processes, providing us with more knowledge of the Earth we all call home.

Finally, some may argue that the preservation of wilderness areas is disadvantageous to the humans and can hinder us from economic gain. Imagine a wilderness area in a heavily populated town and to expand this town, the city council want to build a shopping mall and train transportation to attract more residents. To do this, they need to destroy the wilderness area, but in doing so, it will bring more attention and add more attractive features for the public. Although tearing down the wilderness will help in the advancement of the human society, it will destroy the home of other creatures. The human species is not the most relevant species and it is not the only species that live on Earth. We may be among the most intelligent species on the planet, but that does not give us the right to help the death of other creatures. So, it would be unfair for us to think we are superior and destroy the homes of other animals and plants.

Though believing the preservation of wilderness areas is not beneficial to the human race has valid points, these claims do not outweigh the benefits of the opposing side. Thus, nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in general, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98694029851 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78790466566 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 833.4 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3424092495 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.807692308 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11538461538 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255321967741 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789202753527 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843353435079 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178665951493 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101875763045 0.0667264976115 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.