Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The prompt urges the nations to pass laws to preserve any wilderness as natural prerogatives even if they could be developed for economic gain. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly disgaree" with given concept and therefore obliged to provide necessary viewpoints in defense of my position.
For the given criteria there is no clear indication in the prompt what type of wilderness it is referring to. For example - there are certain types of wilderness which is santuary for migratory birds, there are some where different types of miniature creatures or plants that can contribue significantly to the harmony and congruency between the human habitation and ecological balance. These types of wilderness are of great importance to us as well as to maintain eclogical and environmental soundness. However, there are also opposite types of wilderness which are hardly of any use. Such as - the barren lands, the abandoned places which contributes nothing apart from the habitation of insects that are harmful to human beings or so on. These types of the wilderness in so compared to the earlier mentioned ones, played little role in ecological balance and that is why it will be better if those wildernesses are taken under authoratative supervison with a view to improving economical aspects. For example - if those fields are taken under the construction builders to build multip[urpose complex or to make new habitation for the people who are homeless then it will be much better served than to be abandoned as these were earlier. The authority will also gain economical benefits from those constructiins or buildings or markets build on the barrend fields and wilderness. So, regarding these prospects the idea of passing laws to preserve any of the wilderness might not be as propitious as it would be if certain type of wilderness are taken in to consideration.
The dichotomy in the statement is that - it condones "any" wilderness devoid of sufficient importance. but this is not the case. In fact, there are many wilderness which do not conduce any significance to the environment as well to the human living. Now, if a certain law is passed, guiding that "any type of wilderness should be preserved then many of such types of wilderness will be abandoned in the nations natural state, although many of which are great importance will be preserved. However, if a proposal is made based on the criteria of the wilderness then it would be much more of value. For example - if the nation does not passed the las to preserve all and any type of wilderness, rather maintains a proper balance and judgement in choosing what type of wilderness are to be of economical value and what are more important to natue and human ecology then it will be a more propitious. Such kind of proposal will not only help to preserve the wilderness, important to eco-diversity but also to wield necessary economic gain by buidling projects and other constructions upon the barren and useless wilderness. By doing such, the nation will be more productive rather than passing law by following unidimensional approach blindly.
Counterintuitive view could be that - even though the some wilderness are barren or do not contribute much to the harmony between human and nature, these are of good natural value and habitation of many bacteria or micro-creatures conducive to better agriculture. The prospect is not disputable as it obviously is. However, to make any decison the nation has to make a priority between the ecological heritage or importance and the livelihood of its people. If its economic health is not great and requires urgent improvements then it would be better off to use those wilderness to make economic value. However, if the nation is of proper better ecnomic health then it might not consider to use those wilderness as the source of economical value. So, in many ways the decison to abandon or preserve or make the wilderness conduicive to economic value, depends on the eco-social condition of the nation as the nations's authority might not consider to preserve its aestheticity only by overlooking its importance to economical value if it is in urgent need to improve the same.
So, looking at all the points and views mentioned above, it might be better to regard the decision of passing law to preserve any wilderness from different perspectives as it will vary depending on the urgency of the nation's economic and environmental condition. However, merely passing laws following certain prototypes may not be helpful for a nation for its future prospects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: SOME_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somewhere'?
Suggestion: somewhere
...santuary for migratory birds, there are some where different types of miniature creatures ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1089, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...he construction builders to build multip[urpose complex or to make new habitation...
^
Line 3, column 1271, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...e earlier. The authority will also gain economical benefits from those constructiins or bu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...erness devoid of sufficient importance. but this is not the case. In fact, there ar...
^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wilderness seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wildernesses'.
Suggestion: many wildernesses
...his is not the case. In fact, there are many wilderness which do not conduce any significance t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'wildernesses'?
Suggestion: wildernesses
...s not the case. In fact, there are many wilderness which do not conduce any significance t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'pass'
Suggestion: pass
...e. For example - if the nation does not passed the las to preserve all and any type of...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ve view could be that - even though the some wilderness are barren or do not contrib...
^^^^
Line 7, column 563, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wilderness' or 'those wildernesses'?
Suggestion: this wilderness; those wildernesses
...ents then it would be better off to use those wilderness to make economic value. However, if the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 696, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wilderness' or 'those wildernesses'?
Suggestion: this wilderness; those wildernesses
...ealth then it might not consider to use those wilderness as the source of economical value. So, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 939, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider preserving'.
Suggestion: consider preserving
...ion as the nationss authority might not consider to preserve its aestheticity only by overlooking it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, as to, for example, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 48.0 19.5258426966 246% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 107.0 58.6224719101 183% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3853.0 2235.4752809 172% => OK
No of words: 758.0 442.535393258 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08311345646 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.24707535641 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99576964557 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.38654353562 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1264.5 704.065955056 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.0460464817 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.703703704 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0740740741 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25925925926 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301566981235 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969469491219 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778704096922 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211759152065 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484467688193 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.