The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt urges that the greatness of an individual can only be understood by his or her precedents, not by the contemporaries. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly disagree" with the concept and hereby I am obliged to showcase necessary elaboration of my points in defense of my position.
To begin with - the statement that - the greatness can not be understood by the contemporaries of an individual rather by could be by his or her progeny - is somewhat considerable not until the term "only" is used. When the term "only" is used then the statement becomes more of an orthodox one to contemplate over. So, the main issue is that the greatness of an individual can be understood by both of his or her contemporaries as well as the generation coming to next. Now, the premise of this statement can be decided upon different situations. And before that we have to be very clear about the term used in the prompt "greatness". In context of the essay it might indicate the clemency of a person, or the deftness of an individual or might be the courage of one or the list might go on. Taking the very first one into consideration - the kindness of a person can easily be perceived by his or her conduct towards other people. It does not necessarily need his or her progeny to come brandish their ancestor greatness or might be. Suppose - a great person who is willing to help his society regardless of his wealth or any precariousness, is loved by all. He is bound to be loved by the mendicants and the poors; hardly manage their body and soul together. Because of his kindness people will love to cherish him before society irrespective of how much he tried to maintain secrecy in his givings. People laud this kind of activites and as a result, the kind person is going to be applauded by his contemporaries and in many cases - the genaration after genaration remembers this kind of person. One very lively example of this kind of personnel we evident in the face of many legends who has bestowed their lives and properties for the development of his society and his native people - who are actually cherished by not only their progeny but also by their contemporary people.
Counter prospect can be derived from the fact that - in various cases people try to remain anoynomous in their deftness or their courage through which they could or wiould like to serve the society and that is why they might not remembared through the respective time rather by their decedents. Yes, the statement supports the partial idea that - there are people actually who want to remain "no-one" or just try to avoid any kind of publicity. But the funny fact is that - if people of the respective times were not being able to consider or were not being introduced by the supremity of a person, he or she (the person) will be lost in oblivion. History has been the evident of the many facts that - such a great amount of schoalrs or warriors - who had showed early promises; could change the world in a great deal - had gone in the darkness of unknown. The sole reason for their precariousness is their unanoynomousity among their surrounding people. So, if the people around a inchoate great person; showing promises can not be properly identified by his or her contemporaries - then he might not be regarded in the history as a "great" peroson at all. In that sense - it is kind of a must to remain familiar with the living person for a true potential person in order to be remembered as great.
Various situation arises where people neglected the greatness of many people for their own advanatges. They had their own persuasion in doing that. However, from the mentioned reasoning and critical remarks it would be enough to support the fact that it is as important for a person to be known to both his progeny and his contemporaries in order to remain as great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...od by both of his or her contemporaries as well as the generation coming to next. Now, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly manage their body and soul together. Because of his kindness people will love to che...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 989, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...unding people. So, if the people around a inchoate great person; showing promises...
^
Line 5, column 1141, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...might not be regarded in the history as a 'great' peroson at all. In th...
^
Line 5, column 1199, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...; peroson at all. In that sense - it is kind of a must to remain familiar with the living...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1209, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...at all. In that sense - it is kind of a must to remain familiar with the living person ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, then, well, kind of, as a result, as well as, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 106.0 58.6224719101 181% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3233.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 681.0 442.535393258 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74743024963 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10842213422 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00062715017 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422907488987 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1017.9 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1710519772 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.32 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.24 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208144613754 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717510071314 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391359668662 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145383285555 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182837334898 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.