Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f

Essay topics:

Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

The opinion states that government should withdraw funding from art and rather concentrate on eradication of unemployment and hunger. Unemployment and hunger are two growing problems of the World. These menaces are rising at alarming rate. Every year, many people starve to death due to financial crunch they face. The financial constraint are resultant of unemployment that has spread like an epidemic. To reduce or eliminate these problems, government requires to take remediation measures. The dilemma is if the government should suspend the funded allocated to arts and rather focus it on fight starvation and unemployment. I disagree with the argument.

Often, the value of art is questioned by many. Art includes painting, architectural and interior design, print-making, communication design and performing arts such as plays and show. The field of arts is extensive and encompasses wide scope and is of immense significance. Firstly, it is a form of expression which conveys emotions, social issues and other political history of the country. The art reflects culture and tradition of the country, thus it would not be wrong to consider it as identity of the nation.

Secondly, the field of art jobs create varying levels and descriptions. The faculty member of university offering courses in arts, museum and gallery staff members, actors, production house staff, writers and directors are employed due to advancement of the field.

Thirdly, the applied disciplines are contributing to development of other fields. Print-making majors serve the textile industry, while architecture and interior designer provide service of their creativity to construction firm. Design Communication is enabling the efficiency of the marketing functions.

Unemployment and hungry are major concerns of the societies, but diverting funding from art would not result in improvement of the situation, rather it will act as catalyst in worsening the condition. Thus, the government should not be discouraged to invest in this valuable field.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 465, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...ate these problems, government requires to take remediation measures. The dilemma is if...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sign, print-making, communication design and performing arts such as plays and sh...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ployed due to advancement of the field. Thirdly, the applied disciplines are con...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58709677419 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08644783687 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3246897397 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150363256356 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411028833732 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431393496561 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067842774037 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438957033509 0.0667264976115 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.