No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of the issue highlights that any field of study should take outside knowledge and experiences into consideration in order to improve extensively. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that there is no notable relevance among various fields of study and if we want to make a conspicuous progress in a field, many pieces of research and explorations in that field should be required. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, there is no doubt that scientists play a consequential role in any given society and not only do they bend over backward to explore and expatiate any phenomena meticulously but also try to do their best to gain proper results. Broadly speaking, a plethora of people might think that different fields of study are dependent upon each other and none of them could be developed exclusively. Indeed, it is a wrong belief spread out to the public. As a tangible example, engineering is of the utmost important field in all around the world without which our lives seem to be paralyzed and no other fields could contribute greatly to the improvement of engineering. As a matter of fact, there would be no link between engineering and medical science, for instance. To elucidate more on this issue, hardly can any specific field make a progress with knowledge outside that field owing to the fact that there are vast majorities of fields and science is becoming perplex and intricate day in day out.
Another salient example to corroborating my personal stance is astronomy, which has no relevance to art but both fields are developing at a very swift pace without outside knowledge. If we take a minute to ponder over it, art is not helpful and useful enough to provide an opportunity for astronomy to make a progress successfully. In fact, improvement of any specific field is constructed based on fundamental conceptions of that field and no other knowledge and experiences will be useful. It can be deduced from the combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that not until more researches and discoveries in any field carry out extensively, can we witness an improved field of study.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, there are many fields, their developments obliged different conceptions from outside that field. As a vivid example, without mathematics and physics, rarely can civil engineering develop successfully because there are crowds of formula and phenomena should be solved by mathematics and physics. So, not only can math help engineering to make a remarkable progress but also can provide fertile ground for any field to develop enormously. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal point of view.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'conspicuous progress'.
Suggestion: conspicuous progress
... fields of study and if we want to make a conspicuous progress in a field, many pieces of research and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 846, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...sue, hardly can any specific field make a progress with knowledge outside that field owing...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... weight to my personal point of view. In light of reasons elaborated, I reiter...
^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, broadly speaking, for instance, in fact, no doubt, as a matter of fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2555.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06944444444 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97690401499 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 823.5 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9872732625 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256034690791 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074947456181 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595001485778 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142920511186 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560815656278 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.