In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is true that reading poetry, novel, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature help to well-rounded personality. It enhances creativity and thinking style of a student. In the school teachers appreciate reading habit of students and provide work to inculcate practice of reading imaginative stuff. At college level it is difficult to start compulsory course of reading fiction books. In my opinion I am disagree with give statement and reasoning for my stance is justify in following paragraphs.
Moreover, there are different activities which helps to well-round an individual. It is not the only way to become multi skilled personality, there are several courses which helps a student to enhance self. For example, there are sports, art and craft, drama, music and others. A student reads novels and story has different personality than a student practice sport daily. Every activity has its own benefits and effects on personality so, it not a good idea to start compulsory course of imaginative literature at college level.
Furthermore, almost every student understands their hobby or liking up to college level and some of them had started work on it to enhance personality. College administrator should emphasis on well development of the student despite giving attention on a course. There should be compulsory to select course other than studies which helps in personality development of students. If they have a course related to their own interest, then it will be beneficial and more appropriate.
However, the imaginative literature helps in order to become multi skilled with strong imaginative and anticipate power of brain. But It is difficult to start its course at college level because at college level academic courses are already very complicate and time-consuming. It may be possible that to start mandatory courses then students will feel overburdened and performance will decline. One more important point is everyone don't like imaginative stuff, some students like academic or logistic writing. So, to start courses relating to imaginative literature is not àpropos at college level.
Conclusively, based on discussion it is clear that with university education we cannot mandatory course other than main course is not a good idea. One should understand all aspects of results of any planning then only it will be beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ading fiction books. In my opinion I am disagree with give statement and reasoning for m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'justified'.
Suggestion: justified
...tatement and reasoning for my stance is justify in following paragraphs. Moreover, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e. One more important point is everyone dont like imaginative stuff, some students l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, for example, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38978494624 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98394725273 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4225218301 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.4761904762 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281104530387 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856953309475 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550252653852 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160635961832 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033274715184 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.