Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is true humans do different activities such as plantation, preservation of wildlife, cultivation of barren land and many more but these are few activities in front of damages. People try to make the earth a comfortable place to live for themselves and for it they use earth carelessly. There are several reasons which support human activities are destructive for earth.
First, the man made disasters creates heavy loss on the earth. Nuclear radiation and accidents, oil spill, bio terrorism, needlessly perish fire are some examples of man made disasters. Recently I read in a newspaper in Indian Ocean Japanese oil ship leaked and due to which a large number of aquatic life came in danger. These accidents clearly reflect that human activities are being perilous for earth.
Second, the animal products such as skin, teeth and horns are very demanding in the market so humans hunt wild animals at large scale to gain profit by selling animals. Due to over hunting of wild animals some species are at risk of extinction. For example, hunting of tigers and cheetahs is illegal but people do and tigers and cheetahs are in danger of extinction.
Third, the natural resources are limited and people are using it excessively due to which the depletion of natural resources harm the earth. For example, in some areas for water people depend on underground water. When the water pulls from underground then the vacant space created at that place and the surface stuck to fill that interior vacant space.
Finally, on the basis of above mentioned examples we can conclude that human activities are not helpful for earth. The human tries to get comfort for themselves and put the earth into risk.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...panese oil ship leaked and due to which a large number of aquatic life came in danger. These acci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so, then, third, as for, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99298245614 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55782013224 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9488515151 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8666666667 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290257755075 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103677808644 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887925024384 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163516978892 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098039985868 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.