Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre

Essay topics:

Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

The author claims that people learn more from a person who has similar thoughts in comparison from a person has opposite or contradictory thoughts. The reasoning behind its claim is disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning process. I fundamentally disagree with this proposition and its clue. In what follows, I will list my potent reasons to support my disagreement.

First of all, the disagreement doesn’t mean that other person will not listen whereas disagreement means that he or she has counter points in your logic. When someone find flaws in our logic then we surely don’t like but it leads to find something better. Everyone wants to be correct but if we accept the idea without thinking then our world stuck at a point. A lucid example which adherents my state is the contradiction occurred over the geocentrism and heliocentrism in the past. If Nicolaus Copernicus did not work against the believes of people than we never understood earth and other planets revolve around sun. People were strongly agreed with geocentricism which means earth is center of the solar system, but he proves the concept of heliocentrism which means the sun is center of universe.

Besides, the disagreement leads to invention and creation. As we all are experiencing new technologies and these technologies are result of disagreement of old technology. In past years we use telephone which has limitations and now we have mobiles, tabs and many more. There are scientists who want something easier device then presently we use, and they are working on it. So, disagreement challenge to monotonous thinking pattern and find innovative idea.

Finally, the author give reason that contradictory thoughts build stress and slower down the learning. Actually, it is true because human being wants to be live within his realm where he or she is safe from others disagreement but when someone break this wall and move ahead to understand other perspective then growth happened. To gain knowledge and growth in an area one should understand the contradictory thoughts of others is necessary. People must learn how to handle the stress because if we convert it into eustress then it will lead us towards innovation. As the proverb said, “strike on a hot iron" it means when iron is red hot then we can change the shape with strike. Similar, disagreement leads to change in routine and stereotype thinking pattern and results something unpredictable.

To wrap up, according to the aforementioned reasons, people learn more from the various views instead of repeating one. As the contradiction presents the new idea with more efficiency raised. So, the contradictory thoughts move towards innovative learning rather than inhibits the learning.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...t can cause stress and inhibit learning process. I fundamentally disagree with this pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...nter points in your logic. When someone find flaws in our logic then we surely don&a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...aus Copernicus did not work against the believes of people than we never understood eart...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'breaks'.
Suggestion: breaks
...om others disagreement but when someone break this wall and move ahead to understand ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...various views instead of repeating one. As the contradiction presents the new idea...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, finally, first, if, so, then, whereas, first of all, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22747747748 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9723680452 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7525273129 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7083333333 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291906471997 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756186761078 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563910815714 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163312043406 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308636957998 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.