As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
By and large, it is of little debate in today’s sophisticated world that technology is of paramount importance. This is inasmuch as people always tend to find a more convenient solution to address their problems. With this in mind, it is quite expected to notice some of its characteristics are somewhat controversial due to its prominent standing; a substantial number of people wonder what role technology has on human’s life. One idea of prominence in this regard is that the more the people rely on technologies, the more they will lose their thinking ability. I personally agree with the statement to some extent. The rationale behind this thesis will be elaborated in the ensuing lines.
First of all, we cannot put the whole community into one group. While, the majority of people tend to accomplish every single task using related technology, others prefer to exert various technics, even more time consuming ones, to finish same tasks. There is no doubt that technology in different manners have never stopped from developing since human being has appeared. So if it is true, which it is, how technology actually has developed? If we blame technology for deteriorating humans’ thinking ability without any exception, how could someone justify all these fascinating changes?
Although majority of people are technology-consumers, others are doing their best to find and evolve technology more and more every day. Working so hard and using their thinking ability, these inventors make living more comfortable by producing new technologies or by developing the available ones. Despite available technologies which these scientists could use, they find more innovative ways to make the world a better place. Therefore, those who depend vastly in technologies should be greatly thankful to scientists. If technology had reduced humans’ thinking power, we wouldn’t have had such an advanced world. From my point of view, while many people rely on technology to solve each problem they confronted, others use it to get more free time to sit and think on how they can contribute to these developments.
To recapitulate, having analyzed the reasoning presented above, one can safely conclude that although accepting the effects of technology advances on humans’ thinking ability is inevitable, there have been always others who used technology efficiently to explore new solutions to humans’ problems. Not only has technology declined the latter group’s thinking ability, but also it has provided them with a great opportunity for contributing more on its development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, no doubt, by and large, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43842364532 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12656570983 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57881773399 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9894409825 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.210526316 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276981671418 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894619562933 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511674794552 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173242419342 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304403980039 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.