As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning.
We live in an era of science and technology. By virtue of science, currently, we are in a prominent position. In this universe, everything has some strength as well as weakness. People have dependencies over technologies to solve different issues relating to our day to day life. The author argues that this over-dependency leads to the deterioration of human own thinking ability. I would not utterly agree with the author regarding technical aspects. Now I am going to discuss the issues behind my opines.
Startingly, if we consider such situations like travelling on foot, a day without a cell phone, an office room without an air conditioner, are we able to survive whereas we are accustomed to it. Uber, an epitome of Technology lessen the sufferings of the Transportation problem. There are lots of things that technology blessed us which cannot be stated in words.
Secondly, Technology helps us to think about bigger problems which were almost impossible previously. Is it possible to set footprint on the moon or the ongoing scientific research (regarding the searching of an Earth-like planet where people can survive)without technology? No, it's not possible. Super Computer, a life-saving tool, processes a huge amount of data and generates lots of information in short time, while it requires human an infinite amount of time, in some cases, it is almost impossible. In medical Science, technology has made revolutionary changes. Now, almost in all developed countries treatment is completely technology based. All critical operations that seem impossible in earlier, now it is possible by virtue of technology. Thus, the reliability and accuracy have enhanced and it makes our life simple and tension free.
Despite blessings upon human life, in some cases, it makes our life difficult. Consider, the case of the invention of Calculator, it has been created to solve larger problems, but people gradually accustomed to use a calculator and stop practising thinking, bit uncomfortable to use own knowledge. Besides, the creation of Facebook, Whatsapp, different video games etc has not only made a revolutionary change in communication but also the over dependency weakens our social interaction with neighbours, family members which is a desideratum of the development of mental health.
Thus to draw a conclusion, every coin has double sides. I would like to say that technology is nothing but the result of finding a solution to the problems by the humans. It is indeed true that technology has made our lives easier but reducing much of the workload, but one must not rely completely on it. It is essential for the individuals to perform short mental exercises in order to retain the thinking abilities and have an overall development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...of the development of mental health. Thus to draw a conclusion, every coin has do...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, in short, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22747747748 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08785919391 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56981981982 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.9080093255 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.84 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.76 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135965223779 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334616409922 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298707638369 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724613843445 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137669017197 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.