As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Considering the extensive development of technology and the result of this subject to deteriorate the capability of humans to think for themselves, I am strongly inclined to take the opposite direction of this statement regarding the numerous advantages of technology applications even in the human thinking. Being one of the most proliferated well-known subjects in all society development, the crucial role of technology in several areas improving the quality of humans life is undeniable. In addition, the diffusion of the novel technology through computer science brings about the innovative area entitled artificial intelligence which enhanced the capability of people thinking. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the revolutionary discovery of artificial intelligence can be indicated as a good example of the technology development to solve the associated problems with humans thinking. As the current future studies reveal, the intensification of information technology prevalence particularly in making and assembling exceeding networks as well as generating massive data can introduce a novel phenomenon to think instead of humans. The artificial intelligence as a novel multi disciplines area get to simulate difficult unsolved problems in various applications such as the environmental pollution, aerospace, and even neural systems of humans. Thus, regarding this core subject of the essay, the contemplation that the technology development can destroy the capability of humans to think for themselves will encounter numerous skeptical viewpoints.
Another primary reason to support the positive role of the technology acceleration reinforcing the capability of humans to think for themselves can be attributed to this subject that technology development provides the appropriate opportunity for humans to assign physical jobs and find more time to think. That is a main reason why the rate of humans inventions have recently increased remarkably.
Aside from the point I made above, there is a casual relationship between the technology utilization on the one hand and some psychological misconceptions on the other hand. For instance, the high rate of technology diffusion in humans life brings about a situation to incline the human working like a android or robot. It goes without saying that these handmade systems use the rational relationships to achieve the definite duties without any emotional response. Regarding the necessity of humans intimation as an inseparable part of their life, this topic can be denoted as the fact that my previous considerations might not hold a true.
Taking all of these perspectives into account, I absolutely put emphasis on the positive role of technology apparition for improvement of human capability to think for themselves. Although, considering the importance of emotional aspect of humans, to my best knowledge, the technology development can lead to some negative impacts on the capability of humans to think for themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ation to incline the human working like a android or robot. It goes without sayin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2621.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69782608696 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28195717692 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 863.1 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7132531355 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.8125 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194878350359 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067186185527 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477836911125 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119231102962 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377442367197 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 14.1392134831 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 48.8420337079 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 12.1743820225 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.1639044944 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 11.8971910112 193% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.7820224719 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.