Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Considering necessity of learning about the past for the people who living in the present, I am strongly inclined to take the side of this statement regarding the history as a great teacher who plays a critical role in the destiny of all societies. Being one of the most proliferated well-known social science subjects, learning about the past has a decisive role for the people succession. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, considering the repetition of numerous events in the past and the remarkable possibility for their occurrence in the near future, it is more advisable to persuade people for studying the past. Needless to say, the main foundation of the history major and its crucial role for policy makers contribute as an inspired knowledge to prevent same past wrong behaviors in the future. For example, politically speaking, the history as well as the social behaviors of successful political leaders can be ascribed a perfect key for future leaders. No matter whether we live in the present or not, it is crystal clear that the requirement of learning about the past has noticeable value for the future prosperous.
Another primary reasons can be indicated as the substantial impact of people awareness from the past to prevent bringing about the irritable situations for their life. In other words, learning about the past can be implied as a teacher who increase the knowledge of the next generations about the harmful effects of doing some abysmal works and behaviors. This enhances the life with the minimum human errors.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I highly tend to put emphasis on the necessity of learning about the past despite living in the present. Regarding the main advantages of the past knowledge such as prosperous pattern and the preemptive impact, I cannot agree more that it is essential for us evoking people to learn about the past.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75312238018 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532307692308 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1601690622 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.583333333 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302335819681 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114708653685 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669156692258 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191930394031 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340968202531 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.