People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In today's era, people are having a very busy life and due to which each and every decision they need to take is vital in their life. The topic raises a controversial issue of whether the people who take their decisions emotionally and afterward conclude them as bad decision are poor decision makers or not. Nevertheless, it depends on the situation which demands a decision emotionally or objectively. Indisputably, most of the decision should be taken objectively by thinking about all the aspects of it.
First of all, emotional decisions are purely taken from the heart without even a bit of thinking. These kinds of decisions are mostly considered as bad decisions. For instance, nowadays in multinational companies, people are resigning a lot after a controversy with the boss due to their anger towards their boss. They don't think logically the other aspects and just emotionally took the decisions in too much eager without even thinking about the later aspects like whether they'll get the other job or not. If they'll let their anger disappear and take their decisions objectively and cleverly, they would be easily able to handle the situation. Thus, taking decisions angrily or emotionally and later criticizing for it makes the decision maker poor with respect to handling real-life scenarios.
Furthermore, some great people take the decisions after a lot of thinking patiently, taking time for their decisions as that decision can impact a lot of people. These decision makers are called objective decision makers. For instance, when Steve Jobs had been removed from the position of CEO in his own company, he doesn't react angrily and took his time for his own benefit. Furthermore, many technical experts delay in their decision just to take it cleverly. The CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai, is a clever decision maker and spends his nights in taking the decision about the product launches of google. Therefore, time is not a constraint in taking a decision if it's worth the time.
Finally, some situation demands a decision early and objectively.
Like in the case of love, since it's a great saying that love is blind and hence it forces people to take the decision emotionally. Many people get in love with their partner just spending a few time with them and the later relationship becomes combative since their decisions are purely based on emotions. Thus, a person should never take the decisions emotionally and later feel disgraced for taking it.
In conclusion, although some situation demands emotional decisions to be made, however people should always think cleverly without hastily taking the decision and later criticizing for it. Thinking cleverly is must needed to take an effective decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to their anger towards their boss. They dont think logically the other aspects and j...
^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...ng about the later aspects like whether theyll get the other job or not. If theyll let...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...her theyll get the other job or not. If theyll let their anger disappear and take thei...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... position of CEO in his own company, he doesnt react angrily and took his time for his...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 33, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...vely. Like in the case of love, since its a great saying that love is blind and h...
^^^
Line 8, column 191, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...love with their partner just spending a few time with them and the later relationship be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 216, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have needed' or 'need'?
Suggestion: have needed; need
...izing for it. Thinking cleverly is must needed to take an effective decision.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12780269058 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70839489064 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461883408072 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.303727636 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.954545455 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311764035578 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118163886111 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687899922574 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184075879388 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627711538231 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.