People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement could be summarized as if emotions interfered decision making process, Poor improper decision could be taken. This statement validation could be proven by a vast example and a experience of people allover the world.
For instance, the judgement in the courts is based only on laws and evidences for a certain case circumstance. Emotionally judgement are not accepted by court. For example a court decision making for a certain case can not be based on an internal feeling of a judging person. Consequently, although a judging person have his own logical explanation of his emotional judgement, the final decision taken for ant case is based only on the existing evidences no matter how much it is explain and the logical reasons of someone's emotions counter this judgment.
Moreover, if the individuals emotions interfered a decision making process, the individual themselves of a decision making committee would have different emotions about a certain subject which could be explain and supported by logic from their own perspective. For example, a committee responsible for issuing an exam of a multi fields testing material, such as GRE exam, each person of this committee would support his/her own emotion to make the heavier weight sections about his own field and support his emotional decision by logic that might be math section should be the most important section among the exam in math responsible in this committee.
On the other hand, some people nowadays follow the emotional guide in making their decision expressing that emotional guide could facilitate a rigid routine system into a flexible and adjusting the existing circumstances on a certain decision
The previously illustrated example bolster the validation of the author's statement that clarify the negative influence of emotional guide in making a decision about the evaluation of this decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n could be proven by a vast example and a experience of people allover the world....
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperience of people allover the world. For instance, the judgement in the court...
^^^
Line 2, column 483, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'explained'.
Suggestion: explained
...ting evidences no matter how much it is explain and the logical reasons of someones emo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meones emotions counter this judgment. Moreover, if the individuals emotions in...
^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... process, the individual themselves of a decision making committee would have dif...
^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ttee responsible for issuing an exam of a multi fields testing material, such as GRE ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in math responsible in this committee. On the other hand, some people nowadays ...
^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting circumstances on a certain decision The previously illustrated example bolst...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d example bolster the validation of the authors statement that clarify the negative inf...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31772575251 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8611605211 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491638795987 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.742704889 60.3974514979 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.666666667 118.986275619 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2222222222 23.4991977007 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279667168332 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129606261415 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635730404124 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161086693876 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210853173665 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.