People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Decision making is a process which should be done in a very phlegmatic and composed way. If decision making will be done on sentimental basis then the outcome would be hampered and ultimately turn out in a poor decision
Before taking any important decision one should always think about all the consequences and then finalize it. Sometimes things don't go in one's way and one may get emotional and take a decision which might be incorrect and it might degrade a person's value. In World Cup 2019, Indian team dropped Ambati Rayudu from the squad for Vijay Shankar. Then during the world cup when Vijay Shankar was injured Mayank Agarwal was called as a replacement for him. This decision hurt Ambati Rayudu and he took retirement from all forms of International cricket.In spite being a very good sportsperson this decision of him which he made emotionally was very poor. Instead he could have come back stronger by practicing hard and sealing the spot in the playing XI again.
One should not try not to take decisions emotionally as one is not in good space at that time. Consider the example of AB De Villiers, one of the greatest batsman of International cricket. He announced his retirement from international cricket as he was not able to win enough for his country as a captain. This decision of him which was taken in much of haste and emotion had cost him as his pledge to return back to South African National team for world cup was denied by the South African Cricket Board. After South African team was obviated from the World Cups people are saying that if he would have been there in the team the team wouldn't have been eliminated. Rather if AB De Villiers had not taken retirement and played the sport willingly he would be the part of the team.
Some decisions which are taken emotionally sometimes stand out to be good but majority of the time it is of utmost importance to be very pragmatic and far-sighted to be a good decision maker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... and then finalize it. Sometimes things dont go in ones way and one may get emotiona...
^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...inalize it. Sometimes things dont go in ones way and one may get emotional and take ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...from all forms of International cricket.In spite being a very good sportsperson th...
^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...hich he made emotionally was very poor. Instead he could have come back stronger by pra...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...d emotion had cost him as his pledge to return back to South African National team for worl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...World Cups people are saying that if he would have been there in the team the team wouldnt have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the team'.
Suggestion: the team
...ing that if he would have been there in the team the team wouldnt have been eliminated. Rather if...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ld have been there in the team the team wouldnt have been eliminated. Rather if AB De V...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 668, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... the team wouldnt have been eliminated. Rather if AB De Villiers had not taken retirem...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67052023121 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54673973092 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508670520231 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0579103859 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179108640863 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685596653218 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613624076966 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136973216134 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412178624528 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.