People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

In our daily life, we tend to make decisions ranging from random to highly significant ones. Some of them are just superficial and negligent, while others have a much bigger role to play. Every decision should be made with some logic behind it, as most of the decision will have bigger implications than one can perceive or foresee.

From arbitrary sartorial decisions to bigger career-related decisions, everyone is busy taking a step forward by making some decisions. While some decisions one has to make quickly and others should be well thought, like career decisions. A heuristic study about pros and cons of any decision and weighing different available options will help in making decisions easier. Often eccentric people responding to the impulsiveness tend to make disastrous decisions. In earlier days, mad kings used to make such decisions, which always resulted in mayhem among the citizen of the kingdom. In ancient India, an emperor started a new currency based on leather departing from set gold and silver coins. Such decisions brought his kingdom to dissolution.

While making important decisions one should critically analyze the situation from a different perspective, studying the pattern and ramifications of such decisions make them a viable option. In the field of engineering, almost all the main industrial disasters could have been thwarted if concerned engineers would have been more cautious towards decision making. In the Piper Alpha disaster, the supervisor switched to the standby pump for pumping flammable gas without checking the alternate pump and its repercussion. The alternate pump was not connected, and highly inflammable gas filled the whole area which eventually caught fire.

However, there are several instances where emotions should also be checked before making decisions. Currently, A successful person should have not only high IQ but also emotional quotient. Cases, where sentiments are involved, should include a mixture of logic and emotions. Decisions which involve relationships should be weighed not only in terms of logic but also emotions. For example, a decision to make Hydropower project will benefit every person availing electricity from that project but at the same time will be detrimental to people living there. In such cases, emotional distress of these people should also be considered.

Lastly, any decision should not be impulsive or purely based on emotions; such decisions often tend to implode. A mixture of logic and emotions evaluated during making decisions will surely be successful, and such people are the efficient decision makers.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, so, well, while, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45208845209 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77240475199 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562653562654 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.818656536 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.863636364 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262223369664 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084760084482 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605719588234 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166433044156 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473988058689 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.