The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.
Some people are inclined to shape their opinion about political leaders, based on their skills and abilities. Nevertheless, it is believed that the focus needs to be shifted toward the behavior of the politicians during the challenging situations. I support the later statement and believe that the proprieties and talents of the leaders cannot unambiguously determine the greatness of their work due to the subjectivity involved in the definition of skills and abilities. In other words, the definition of "important skills", as well as the preference toward one skills over another may differ from one person to another. Thus, in order to generalize and make sure that all the leaders are judged fair, it is important to observe their actions during the challenging situations.
First of all, it is a well-known fact that the people who are faced with certain challenges have a hard time concealing their true motives. Indeed, the behavior of many politicians have corroborated the stated argument by unacceptable actions at the official events. For instance, a rapid decision of the president of Russia to cancel the transportation of goods from abroad to Georgia via Russia implied the hostile relationships between the presidents. Therefore, it is utterly significant to look at the behavior of a leader in the involved situations before forming opinion about his or her rulling abilities.
Secondly, the decisions that are made when facing complicated situations reveal the true personalities of leaders. The above-presented example not only illustrated the true interrelations between the politicians, but also demonstrated the charecter of Vladimir Putin: the hot-tempered, rebellious and austere.
Finally, the actions taken in the difficult situations demonstrate the implied skills and abilities. Whether a leader is a quick problem solver or he or she tends to panic when faced with a challenge is going to be clear once the right time has come. one may propose that this argument proposed an indirect judgment of a leader based on the aptitude and talents. However, the evaluation of these politicians would not be as rigorous without analyzing their reaction in challenging situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the involved situations before forming opinion about his or her rulling abiliti...
^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion about his or her rulling abilities. Secondly, the decisions that are made wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctions taken in the difficult situations demonstrate the implied skills and abili...
^^
Line 25, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... be clear once the right time has come. one may propose that this argument proposed...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50144927536 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1652996751 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6421693051 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.533333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 5.21951772744 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21650529022 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644804913601 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507451237185 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115124251917 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578906189242 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.