To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people are prone to think that the characteristics of a society are shaped by the residents of major cities. Nevertheless, it is believed that this statement does not take into consideration several important factors, that led to my disagreement with the above-stated opinion.
first of all, it has been known that the tourists’ main attractions are the beautiful alleys in famous cities, breathtaking views from the historical places and popular restaurants in the downtown area. These factors influence their decision on which cities to visit and lead to an increased number of international people in certain cities. Therefore, if the study is concentrated in specific areas, i.e. on major cities, that are considered to be hot spots for incoming tourists, the outcome of the research will not fully represent the society in a certain city.
Secondly, as an indisputable fact, the lifestyle in the major cities significantly differs from that in the smaller, village-like places. In other words, the personality and mentality of people who live in a quieter and less stressful city is not going to correspond to those of workaholic residents of big cities, who tend to lead a more stressful lifestyle. Thus, one could argue that the studies that would be necessary to make conclusions about the peculiarities of a certain society will only demonstrate the characteristics of city residents and will not be conclusive.
Regardless of the above-stated arguments, any undertaken study represents the average representative of the number of variables, that would imply that studying society in major cities could be the right approach. Indeed, if the focus is on the population of the higher than 50% of the city, i.e. the majority, then the obtained findings will refer to at least half of the country’s population.
In addition to this, the studies on different people are going to be more consistent with each other and are less likely to have outliers, if they do not take into a consideration all cities of a country. Although, such a “smoothing” of data might bias a primary focus on major cities, the accuracy of the conclusion is not expected to be significantly influenced by this bias.
Overall, it is clear that the first two arguments overweighted the benefits of undertaking studies in major cities demonstrating the importance of a detailed research of both major and minor cities, that will lead to more accurate findings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ment with the above-stated opinion. first of all, it has been known that the tour...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty and mentality of people who live in a quieter and less stressful city is not g...
^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...all cities of a country. Although, such a 'smoothing' of data might bia...
^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the conclusion is not expected to be significantly influenced by this bias. ...
^^
Line 11, column 148, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'detailed research'.
Suggestion: detailed research
... cities demonstrating the importance of a detailed research of both major and minor cities, that wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, in addition, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22361809045 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23495267588 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4244801698 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.923076923 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6153846154 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12946096314 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490025359596 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281111082903 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735448337347 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278790335448 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.