Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown.
<style type="text/css">
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 21.0px; font: 12.0px 'Lucida Grande'; color: #000000; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000}
p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 21.0px; font: 12.0px 'Lucida Grande'; color: #000000; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000; min-height: 15.0px}
span.s1 {font-kerning: none}
</style>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">People believed for many decades that the sayings of old people, as well as their behavior should be a paragon of current societies’ actions and beliefs.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Nevertheless, this opinion is highly debated by their opponents and may be thought of as an obstacle toward the new innovations and progress. I agree with the opponents and support the importance of progress for the greatness of society, as it pushes us toward the discovery of the unknown and toward the formation of strong bonds in a community.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1"></span><br></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">First of all, as more societies abandon their comfort zones and strive toward<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>a progress, the chances of making scientific breakthroughs are going to increase. Even hundreds of centuries earlier, people have brought innovations and discoveries without which our society would not exist today. The cavemen’s discovery of a fire would not be possible without a person’s intrinsic curiosity and extraordinary thinking. Thus, the greatness and power of the society lies in its innovations and the discovery of the unknown, as opposed to the constant beliefs and the earlier established ideas.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1"></span><br></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Second of all, the progress<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>implies not only the growth of innovations, but also the growth of collaborations in the community. In other words, the collective problem-solving and the support needed to overcome the fears of unexplored areas make the bonds within the community much stronger.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1"></span><br></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Thirdly, the absence of progress does not always have a neutral effect on the society. Indeed, by staying in familiar places, thinking the same thoughts and acting in the same way, people’s minds may degrade, leading to a global degradation. This would cancel out all the efforts, that have been put in order to reach the intellectual level of our current society and will lead to the level, from which our society has been developed.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1"></span><br></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">The above-presented arguments consolidated my opinion by demonstrating the importance of progress in the great society and the role that it plays in the human collaborations, as well as intelligence. By prioritizing the progress, obviating the comfort zone and discovering new ideas, our society will continue to thrive and blossom.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></p>
<br>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, as well as, first of all, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3239.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 7.69358669834 5.05705443957 152% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.73806425388 2.79657885939 312% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53919239905 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 23.0359550562 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 234.868337165 60.3974514979 389% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 359.888888889 118.986275619 302% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 46.7777777778 23.4991977007 199% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3333333333 5.21951772744 294% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 4.97078651685 262% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00982151653425 0.243740707755 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00996305101858 0.0831039109588 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0128217617446 0.0758088955206 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00446552665655 0.150359130593 3% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00879039945343 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 38.2 14.1392134831 270% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -0.59 48.8420337079 -1% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.92365168539 216% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.8 12.1743820225 204% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 28.21 12.1639044944 232% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.38706741573 127% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.0 11.8971910112 252% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.4 11.2143820225 182% => OK
text_standard: 30.0 11.7820224719 255% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.