The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.

Essay topics:

The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.

The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.

The issue of whether the perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent talents alone, has engendered controversy and can be divided into two schools of thought. On the one hand, staunch defenders support that harsh conditions and unpropitious circumstances promote leaders to rise and face all the negatives. On the other hand, opponents contend that certain characteristics not commonly found discern great leaders from all others. I wholeheartedly believe that challenges highlight the greatness of a magnanimous leader, but they also need to possess the pertinent wit and charisma in their effort to succeed and make the difference.

First and foremost, difficulty political and historical events can render a leader competent since he needs to rise to the challenge. It is clearly illustrated in the case of Nelson Mandela, the prominent leader of South Africa, who languished for an important part of his life in prison. Nelson was a sound opponent and fighter against apartheid, one of the great abominations of the African Continent. After his acquittal and release, he played a significant role in securing a conciliatory mostly peaceful end to apartheid. Regarding this, he secured a hopeful and democratic start for his country that even the most quixotic thoughts could not have imagined a few years earlier.

In addition, all of that would not have been possible without Nelson’s wit and charisma. He would have left prison years earlier just by renouncing violence or making some sort of concession. Instead, he had a great determination and he wanted to establish what he considered fair and unbiased. By nature compromiser and conciliator, even after taking political power as president, he suggested peaceful negotiations and serenity with the congress. When the government eventually yielded, Mandela showed neither bitterness nor vindictiveness, but an astonishing capacity for forgiveness and conciliation.

Moreover, some other examples of great leaders who displayed competence in conjunction with wit and passion for their cause may occur. Winston Churchill, possessing relentless passion for his cause as the leader of Great Britain contributed fiercely against the fascist threat. His deeds and alacrity render him as the catalyst of the outcome during the Second World War, where the allies achieved winning results against the most hated and brutal regime of fascists the world has ever seen. Abraham Lincoln was also a leader whose actions against slavery remain at the cornerstone of justice and equality between humans of different color and beliefs. He demonstrated an ability to withstand adversity and unite his nation when the gap between the northern and southern states deeply wounded any sense of common culture and probity. Only by such elements America could prosper and move forward.

Hence, a leader characterized by greatness and efficacy should possess traits that would enable him to encounter hardships and rise to challenges. The combination of these two parts ensures success and denotes that there is always a solution to even the most harmful and jeopardous situations around the world. Traits like integrity, persistence, perseverance and passion for apolitical or social cause are between the fundamentals of a fair and respectful society.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, in addition, sort of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 39.0 14.8657303371 262% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2999.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 556.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39388489209 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94015132329 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 313.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562949640288 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 927.9 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8970998276 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.958333333 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440875617163 0.243740707755 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114062672514 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.222331944695 0.0758088955206 293% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30558762835 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.344720601925 0.0667264976115 517% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 100.480337079 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.