Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
The issue of whether undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should require to take any courses in the Humanities, has engendered controversies, and can be divided into two schools of thought. On the one hand, staunch defenders support that idea assuming that Humanities are redundant in those different fields. On the other hand, opponents contend that by such a denial, people will be less qualified in an important scientific field. Were I, in such an ambiguous position whether to agree or disagree, I would support the latter argument sound, even though the former one has some positive attributes.
First and foremost, undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences need to have varying disciplines and traits, as a result of their education and knowledge. Consequently, at the undergraduate level of their studies they should pursue to learn as much as possible from all the different scientific fields, something that renders the exclusion of Humanities useless. For instance, a future executive in a big corporation who has attended a renowned business school that did not support the study of Humanities, would be vulnerable in cases of human ressources. Thus, he or she might not face difficulties in terms of management but this would constitute an inchoate business profile.
In addition, the divergence of courses and studies always benefits students for developing important skills and sharpen their acument. To be precise, they learn to estimate logically different situations and promote a multifaced inclination of life. For example, someone who has taken varying courses during his or her undergraduate circle of studies, seems to be confident and sure about what scientific field of expertise he or she likes more to pursue. To adduce another example as pertinent evidence: perhaps someone with undergraduate studies in energy business, would be productive about both the economic and social impact of energy policies.
According to the other school of thought, Humanities would be completely usefull in the undergraduate studies of those who tend to follow careers in Business or in the Sciences. This might be true at some point, because Humanities could be easily neglected by the relevant students and therefore, the whole role and knowledge of the specific field could be undermined. Nonetheless, probably it could be effective if the specific courses exist as an option to most students. Hence, only those who have a strong interest would choose them.
In conclusion, I wholeheartedly believe that during the circle of undergraduate studies, students should be able to practice different scientific fields. This is an important element that would bolster the creation of independent and strong personalities. In reference to this, our societies would prosper and overcome any obstacles and deleterious circumstances. There would also be many new achievements, since the new scientists will face experiments and problems from different scopes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2563.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4764957265 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04871926659 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4200424328 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.15 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.65 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327697523476 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901483432503 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827091310926 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172965616439 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427919147769 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.