The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.
In life, some things control another and just like in the realms of the spirit whereby the spiritual controls the physical, so also it is in the earthly realm that the internal factors or forces determine how one would respond to seemingly external forces. An individual who encounters a snake would only be made to run for his dear life because his initiative compelled him to and also, such individual will be able to outrun the snake solely because of his inherent speed or running ability. In either ways, if such individual would be revered with praise for being smart enough, his inherent skills and abilities should be given more accolades. With this effect, the concept of difficulties contributing more to the sense of greatness of a leader than the leader's inherent abilities is flawed to a great extent
Agreeable, it is by virtue of an individual being able to achieve a purpose or overcome a difficult that the watching crowd would be able to ascertain whether such individual is great or strong enough. However, people should not fail to understand that, before any purpose at all could be accomplished, some things would have been utilized and set in place and most times, some of those things utilized has a lot to do with inbuilt abilities. Challenges help to build courage and experiences but it is through the use of inner characteristics that one can be able to tackle problems and manacles
Furthermore, challenges only stand to make a man realise the magnitude of the strength he is encapsulated with most times. For instance, an athlete would not fathom or rather, might not be able to understand how fast he can run unless he is probably made to compete with the best in the field. At the end of the race, if peradventure the athlete succeed, he would be esteemed with a sense of greatness, but not to be forgotten is the inherent ability of speed and tactics that was put to use in the first place
Conclusively, from all being said, it is apparent that, it is the internal factors that facilitate adequate response to external forces through which victory is won and also, in most cases, it is by virtue of what one has been equipped with, one would be able to dispense out (just like the popular saying "Gabbage in, Gabbage out"). If the inherent abilities are obsolete, challenges will remain insurmountable and so, no sense of greatness would be perceived. Therefore, if any would be more deserving of praise, it definitely would be the inherent abilities and skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 814, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt abilities is flawed to a great extent Agreeable, it is by virtue of an individ...
^^^
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be able to tackle problems and manacles Furthermore, challenges only stand to ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in most cases, in the first place, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80555555556 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74842126401 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490740740741 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.980352811 60.3974514979 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 207.6 118.986275619 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.2 23.4991977007 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.21951772744 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216579884813 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990409752138 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620597446096 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133677464834 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535490668273 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 14.1392134831 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.