“The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.”
Political leaders create an image for themselves by doing good or bad for the public. The image is also affected by the inherent skills and abilities they possess. But the accolades of a political leader has greater inclination towards to the skills and abilities than the challenges faced by them because of the following reasons.
Firstly, challenges are not overcome easily they require knowledge and prowess. The skills and abilities which the leader inherits is put to use to tackle the challenges and come up with a solution. It is a cause and effect relationship, without these skills the challenges would be still be present. For instance, Gandhi is known worldwide for ahimsa which translates to non-violence and not for the many movements he rallied.
Secondly, challenges are not the right measure to weigh greatness. Because every challenge is objective and poses different problems. It extent can be very small or it can also lead to a catastrophe. Since the depth of every challenge is unique, what is common between them is the application of skills to provide solution to various unique challenges. For example, a small town in the least populated state is devastated by the floods and the nation suffering from acute unemployment. Both are challenges which a leader has to look after and act upon, but the intensity is different in both the scenarios. So it is more focused on the skill and ability of the leader to act quickly and make the right decision rather than the event itself.
Thirdly, a new leader is elected based on his skills and abilities because that is the only thing he brings to the table. And he is judged by the public for the actions taken by him during a time of trouble and not by the end result.
Fourthly, not every leader comes out of a pickle successfully. There are many leaders who can’t overcome certain challenges but that does not affect the greatness or the image of the leader instead it is relied upon how he acts on it. For instance, in India poverty and unemployment has long been a standing problem for the growth of the nation, but even after successful failures at solving this, the political leaders are widely respected and considered great.
To conclude greatness of every political leader has a lot to do with the feats he has achieved and challenges he tackled but has a lot more to do with his skill or ability to come up with these solutions. It is because of these skills he can think and act quickly upon the challenges that has come across him. The greatness of the leader is more reliant on the abilities of the leader rather than the challenges that he has come across.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ies which the leader inherits is put to use to tackle the challenges and come up wi...
^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not for the many movements he rallied. Secondly, challenges are not the right m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77006507592 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6484398969 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451193058568 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.167038306 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9545454545 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322582064983 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940432752208 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849373808362 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171840841254 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780737262938 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.