Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev

Essay topics:

Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

A true leader is like being yourself and a doppelganger, a leader should have his moral principles and ideals that set him apart while also be considerate to hear and adjust to his follower’s voices. An amalgamation of the two is what makes a great leader. The prompt suggests that Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals, I strongly agree with this for two reasons.

Firstly, Politicians are appointed to office regardless of the type of government present in a country or state and are expected to serve the people as after being sworn to office. This responsibility comes with so much anticipation from the masses than fellow comrades or the government itself. Why so? As a politician, it is expedient that policies that govern successfully the country are made or readjusted to suite the ever-changing economy and status quo. This process can make or mar the strength of country vis a vis other country. Take for example, Abraham Lincoln, who is appointed the President of the United States in the 1800s. At the time, a cry for the ruling out of slavery was enormous, including the Civil war that occurred. White supremacy was still imperative and at that time, many also didn’t want that paradigm shift. As the President, not only did he have to be judicious with his decision, but he is also took the populace at heart, he crafted what one might say the greatest movement of all which eventually led to the abolishment of slave trade. This movement, till date, has shaped the US to what it is today, and the impact still being felt today with movements such as the ‘Black lives matter’ and so forth.

Further, the parliament which all the time comprises of politicians assembled to enact policies that favour the citizens and country at large is a vital aspect. Here, it is desired that a common ground should be reached for a sort after objective to be reached. For instance, in a democratic government, in the state house of assembly, it is important that a reasonable consensus be reached in passing out bills that will reach the senate house before enacted by the President. It is possible that speaker of house assembly might have his ideal goals of increasing the road networks in the state or country, others might not agree as the present roads are damaged with port holes and a repair is needed. For things to go forward, an exemplary leader will allow for the repair of roads and thereafter focus on new roads which all parties will agree too.

Finally, one can argue, that a great leader needs to be elusively idealistic with his approach, as with that the community will be driven towards that goal without considerations to naysayers. While this has worked with the case of Adolf Hitler, who arguably had the best regime due to his idealistic nature, this will come inevitably come short as seen. Thus a leader should pursue common ground while also retaining some sort of ideals.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'comrades'.
Suggestion: comrades
... much anticipation from the masses than fellow comrades or the government itself. Why so? As a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 931, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...cious with his decision, but he is also took the populace at heart, he crafted what ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...ther, the parliament which all the time comprises of politicians assembled to enact policies...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ill come inevitably come short as seen. Thus a leader should pursue common ground wh...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, sort of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83693516699 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64705594508 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52652259332 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9881917763 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.1 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.45 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1804340317 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530742807765 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697136715479 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117979532359 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480666844986 0.0667264976115 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.