The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Talent is a hard terminology to be defined, especially in the context of a musician. Talent might be judged upon various factors like how unique the content is and how the work is been appreciated by others etc. Some music pieces might become transient, some might be relevant for all time since its creation. Someone might argue that true judgement of a talented musician can only be done posthumously, in order to compare them with other famous musicians of different timescales. However, posthumous interpretations of the music pieces might not be as accurate as the composers would have liked, therefore, that music might have been undervalued and the true talent might have been missed by the audience.
The posthumous judgement of musicians talent might even go wrong. Basically, musical composition is the collage of life experiences of the musician, therefore, their meanings might often be misinterpreted. As an example, famous Bengali artist Manna Dey composed beautiful songs, or as we interpreted because the interpretation mostly is done by the artist while he was alive. We really get to know what those songs actually wanted to explain to the audience. Talents should be judged when they are alive otherwise their hard work might all go in vain if those compositions can't be appreciated properly.
Otherwise, posthumous judgement of talent might be accurate in case of comparing artists from different generations. Although the process is not entirely convincing, as different generation might have different taste in music and can appreciate some songs better than the other. But. for the sake of an argument, if someone wants to judge musicians of different timescales, then their talents might only be judged after they are gone, provided their compositions are explained and appreciated as accurately as possible.
Whatever the era is or however the taste of the generation is, compositions of the musicians should always be respected because those are the work worth their lifetime. However, for the sake of comparison, one might take the concept of posthumous judgement seriously if they want to compare in between several talented workpieces. Although, if someone wants to truly appreciate and apprehend the compositions, they need to appreciate their work while the musicians are still alive. Afterall, the final destination of the music pieces is to be appreciated by the audiences, without proper appreciation, the aim would not be achieved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ht all go in vain if those compositions cant be appreciated properly. Otherwise,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... some songs better than the other. But. for the sake of an argument, if someone wan...
^^^
Line 7, column 483, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...rk while the musicians are still alive. Afterall, the final destination of the music pie...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, really, so, still, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31632653061 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96922995583 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487244897959 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0149533018 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.588235294 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186038391765 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769459839957 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500014148931 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129418981681 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311261807004 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.