The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.

Essay topics:

The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.

Some says music is a soul food, some says it is a drug for a broken heart. We have seen so many famuos singer in the past and seen rise of so many popular talented singer. They have diversified and enriched the field of music. But is it a matter of contention to some people that the fame interfere with the honest assessment of a musicain's talent. As we live in the era of information when open opinion is much appreciated, one can easily express their likings in this regard. Ans as music is a art form no particular standard is there to judge a musicians talent. So, it is not necessary that a popular musician's fame will actually hinder the honest assessment during his or lifetime to be accurate in judging the musician's talent.

In the west, we have seen a number of generes rise in the music industry. There are rock, pop, rap etc. types of song. Although some of this genres struggled at time, but each genre has produces a number of legendary musicians. We can name Sir Elton John, Elvis, Eminem as a recognisable name in individual music sectors. All of their works are available to the mass people and each genre has their own follower base. As music is a matter of art, the very nuances appeal differently to different type of people. One characteristics of a genre might not be even applicable to the other genre. Also the taste of music keep changing over time. So, It will not be even fair to judge a musician in terms of the standard set in a later decades.

If we look at the field of classic music in india, we can find many famous musician like Pandit Ravi Shankar, Ar Rahman, Mitali Mukharjee, etc. Their music has stood the test of time and still extant. Although the origin of the music remain fairly archaic, but each passing generation has their superstars in this genre of music. They were venerated at their time and still remembered by the current generation. A good critic can always identify a gem of his respective field and can actually judge the talent based on the merit of the music not on the fame. At the same time as an art form, it is not also fair to judge a contemporary music with a standard from a different time.

Although, music taste vary from person to person, a critic or reviewer can be biased to a certain genre of music or might have personal opinion against a musician. Also, in current age of communication an honest opinion against the mass choice might result in serious lash back. Thus the critics stay aware to always give the unqualified version of their opinion. Thus, sometimes a seemingly popular but inferior music might be appealing for a few months or even years. But eventually disappears when the craze diminishes and does that very quickly. In the recent time, we have seen so many example of this phenomenon, like the song "Gangnum Style", which garnered so many listeners, yet got forgotten very quickly.

So, in the era of technology, although tech assisted singers have arisen and created little buzz, but they were ephemeral. Most of the talent famous musicians passed the test of time and stayed popular regardless of their era, current of future. So in the age of open imformation it is not appropriate to say that a singer's fame might hinder honest judgement of talent.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'says'' or 'say's'?
Suggestion: says'; say's
Some says music is a soul food, some says it is a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...likings in this regard. Ans as music is a art form no particular standard is ther...
^
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...particular standard is there to judge a musicians talent. So, it is not necessary that a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 606, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
... So, it is not necessary that a popular musicians fame will actually hinder the honest as...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 717, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
... lifetime to be accurate in judging the musicians talent. In the west, we have seen a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ap etc. types of song. Although some of this genres struggled at time, but each genr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'One characteristic', 'a characteristic', or simply 'characteristics'?
Suggestion: One characteristic; A characteristic; Characteristics
...ifferently to different type of people. One characteristics of a genre might not be even applicable...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... be even applicable to the other genre. Also the taste of music keep changing over t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'decade'?
Suggestion: decade
...in terms of the standard set in a later decades. If we look at the field of classic ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e Pandit Ravi Shankar, Ar Rahman, Mitali Mukharjee, etc. Their music has stood th...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... a certain genre of music or might have personal opinion against a musician. Also, in current ag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oice might result in serious lash back. Thus the critics stay aware to always give t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 587, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'many examples'.
Suggestion: many examples
...ly. In the recent time, we have seen so many example of this phenomenon, like the song &apos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'singers'' or 'singer's'?
Suggestion: singers'; singer's
...ion it is not appropriate to say that a singers fame might hinder honest judgement of t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, so, still, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 581.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62134251291 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56621022693 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461273666093 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 874.8 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4039264107 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.90625 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15625 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4375 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192702974492 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521362774899 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822085450165 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127480900048 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915304909538 0.0667264976115 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.