Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement

Essay topics:

Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Universities and educators always prepare curriculums to benefit students and it is our duty to believe in their intuitions. However, every student have their own major they want to pursue, hence students opinion also should be taken into consideration. In my opinion, I partially disagree with the author stating that variety of courses are required for a person to be truly educated for the following reasons.
To begin with, the economic development of a nation depends upon the education of youngsters. Hence, if students excel in variety of courses, there will be an economic development in the nation. It will reduce illiteracy rate in the country and many more. For example, if a student studies about politics and science, he will have opportunities to pursue his career in politics or science. Also, if for instance, political job market falls apart with recession then he will have an opportunity to find jobs in science thereby reducing unemployment rate in the country. Thus, improving knowledge in various fields provides benefits to the nation.
However, there are people who excel in specified courses who contribute to the development of a country too. If a person is specialised in a specific course of study then he will have a better chance for creating his own opportunity for jobs. For example, if a student specialises in marketing but wasn’t able to get a job in marketing, he can build his own firm or company with his specialised skills. So, there is no need for various subjects to interfere with students who have a determined goal.
Also, if determined student studies various courses beyond his major, then it will lead to waste of time. For example, a student pursuing biology would have no relation with math or social science. Extraneous subjects will only distract the students from achieving proper specialisation. Moreover, it will add stress and presser while learning various courses in a short span of time. Thus, instead of studying various courses, if students focus on one major subject, they are determined to succeed in it.
In conclusion, students have different perspective and depending upon their interest’s curriculum has to be followed. Also, it is important not to dump myriad of subjects on students. Thus, universities can provide elective subjects for students and based on student’s particular interests, they can join any course of study which would guarantee a successful future and a truly educated student in that particular field.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88482990147 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1738286442 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234567861064 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744844379347 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566792630671 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152898959227 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656218831191 0.0667264976115 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.