Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim.
In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author here asserts that scandals are useful because they grab our attention to the issues in much better way if compared
to any speaker or any social reformer trying to bring that to the notice of the general public.I disagree with the author's opinion
as it can proven wrong on several grounds.Few reasons for my disagreement have been listed below.
Scandals may seem to grab attention of the masses as there is a spice in the story added by the media for the publicity of their channels.
Even the newspaper editors make sure that they are adding enough spice to catch the attention of the readers for good revenues and other personal incentives.
Doing so, unnecessary and malicious content is also incorporated to make it look more appealing.But nowadays, public is aware of these stunts performed by these
people and hence, reserve their doubts on these issues.
To say that scandals convey the issues better than any speaker or reformer would be somewhere wrong because there are some leaders with whom the public associates a lot of
credulity and they have good oratory skills to voice the problems. To illustrate this, I would take the example of Mr. Narendra Modi who is the
Prime Minister of India. The way he brings captivates people's attention, puts forth the past, current, future issues in front of them is mesmerizing.
Not just him, let's talk about reformer Mother Terresa, who with her actions not only got people's attention to the problems like poverty, illiteracy and many more
but also mitigated them.
Also, not all types of scandals are useful like sex scandals of various celebrities.In the current world models who are not getting jobs are adopting
these means to get money while providing content to the news reporters which is unneccessary and alarming for the society. Definitely not all news is fake
but these things cast a doubt on the authenticity of these scandals .
Hence,to conclude scandals are useful to grab the attention of the crowd but to state that no speaker or reformer could ever do it the same way or in a better way
would be wrong. The scandals come from untrustworthy sources as well driven by self motives and if the powerful and trustworthy speakers or reformers would bring these issues
in light they will get the desired attention in the same way or even better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he issues in much better way if compared to any speaker or any social reformer tr...
^^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ying to bring that to the notice of the general public.I disagree with the authors opinion as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...hat to the notice of the general public.I disagree with the authors opinion as i...
^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... the general public.I disagree with the authors opinion as it can proven wrong on seve...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'prove' or 'be proven'?
Suggestion: prove; be proven
...ree with the authors opinion as it can proven wrong on several grounds.Few reasons fo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Few
... it can proven wrong on several grounds.Few reasons for my disagreement have been l...
^^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...rporated to make it look more appealing.But nowadays, public is aware of these stun...
^^^
Line 8, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with whom the public associates a lot of credulity and they have good oratory ski...
^^^
Line 13, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ike sex scandals of various celebrities.In the current world models who are not ge...
^^
Line 14, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...society. Definitely not all news is fake but these things cast a doubt on the aut...
^^^
Line 15, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...bt on the authenticity of these scandals . Hence,to conclude scandals are useful ...
^^
Line 16, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , to
... authenticity of these scandals . Hence,to conclude scandals are useful to grab th...
^^^
Line 17, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs or reformers would bring these issues in light they will get the desired atten...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, so, then, well, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90680100756 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53393423484 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551637279597 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8649816823 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.333333333 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0833333333 23.4991977007 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.97078651685 362% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223348002352 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771781924201 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679617408357 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643252943275 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627889341558 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.