Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
I to a certain extent bolster the idea of scandals being useful and viewpoint of the author. Scandals draw huge attention from all classes of the society irrespective of which caste,creed or gender you belong to and hence the author's statement about scandals being efficable as compared to speakers is true.
Firstly, when scandals are revealed they not only seek attention of the entire society but also reveal indulgement of some leader or worker at a very high position and as a society we come to know about his/her real motives and hence, scandals helps us to segregate people and helps us to comprehend whom shall we support. For example, in India when 2G scam was encountered there were revelation of many big hands in that scam and they were put behind the bars after proper investigations and comman people get to know who about them which I personally think would never come out if there was no scandal.
Secondly, when we come across such scandals we come to know loop-holes in our system and this helps us to amend laws and in return strengthens our judiciary system, for example, A businessmen decieved a government bank and left the country with crores of stolen money, when investigation was held it came by that there was no rule like extradition bonds with other countries and hence the court had to relectantly drop the case but, after that there were amendments in the judicial and economical laws.
However, the author has generalized the statement that only through scandals we can draw attention, but like Socrates said "we do not have that much time that we learn from our own mistake, and instead we should learn from others mistakes as well" so it is not important that a country must have scandals to draw attention of the people for problems.
Sometimes it might be fine that people get to know about certain problems from scandals but nowhere it is true that speaker couldn't draw people's attention to problems, for example - Mahatma Gandhi he was a great speaker and people used to call him mass mobilizer, he was the one who draw attention to Indians that we cannot live under supression and must seek freedom its our birth-right. He with any deception and solely through words united an entire nation of about 100 million people and brought a reform that shook the entire colonial government and which ultimately led to independence of India.
Hence, it is not prudent to generalize that only scandals can bring important reforms and speaker are not abled to bring reforms and draw attention of society as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , creed
... the society irrespective of which caste,creed or gender you belong to and hence the a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d or gender you belong to and hence the authors statement about scandals being efficabl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A businessman' or simply 'businessmen'?
Suggestion: A businessman; Businessmen
...hens our judiciary system, for example, A businessmen decieved a government bank and left the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...als but nowhere it is true that speaker couldnt draw peoples attention to problems, for...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people used to call him mass mobilizer, he was the one who draw attention to Ind...
^^
Line 9, column 370, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... under supression and must seek freedom its our birth-right. He with any deception ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8701594533 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57328535547 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526195899772 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 23.0359550562 208% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.180757139 60.3974514979 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 237.555555556 118.986275619 200% => OK
Words per sentence: 48.7777777778 23.4991977007 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.5555555556 5.21951772744 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207255701926 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948610392309 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439653270972 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115322530267 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393241430442 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.9 14.1392134831 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.22 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 12.1743820225 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.2 11.2143820225 189% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.