Science is meaningless without religion

Essay topics:

Science is meaningless without religion

In the 21st century, when the world is progressing swiftly in the field of science where scientists are either discovering new elements or inventing nascent products, some people still believe in religion. The prompt is stating that without religion Science is meaningless. In my opinion, science, and religion are not correlated, they contradict each other in various ways based on the below example.

To begin with, the prompt is conveying that science does not have any meaning if religion is not associated with it. For instance, religion preaches to us about the way of life, and how we humans should cater to each other in this beautiful world created by the Almighty. While science teaches us how we can make this world a better place for people by applying the principles of science and creating new products or inventions that can be beneficial to all. The above example illustrates that science and religion have no relation and the prompt is not true.

Alternatively, Religion contains information about theories and inventions from years ago that today's scientist claim to be their discoveries belies the above-stated paragraph. It is the religion that is the encyclopedia of many theories and invention that has helped us progress in life. The prompt science is meaningless without religion is true.

To sum up, we can conclude that, from few instances, we can say that science does has meaning without religion, but what science believes is true is based on theories from religion.

Votes
Average: 3.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ries and inventions from years ago that todays scientist claim to be their discoveries...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 246.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11788617886 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76433823308 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9856668843 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458761566869 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23429429844 0.0831039109588 282% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.232804598252 0.0758088955206 307% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305081397406 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646671398674 0.0667264976115 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.